The Predictive Validity of the Danger Assessment for Immigrant Women (DA-I)

Immigrant survivors of intimate partner violence (IPV) face particular risks and have unique strengths; IPV risk assessments must account for diverse lived experiences. This validation study of the Danger Assessment for Immigrant (DA-I) women assessed risk factors and experiences of IPV across four timepoints among immigrant IPV survivors from diverse world regions (<i>n</i> = 122). The Receiver Operating Characteristic Area Under the Curve assessed the predictive validity of the DA-I, which ranged from .794 to .892 in the full sample and .652-.943 in regional subsamples. Used appropriately, the DA-I offers survivors an opportunity to make knowledgeable and empowered decisions regarding their safety.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Violence Against Women
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012251391128
Primary Topic
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Predictive Validity of the Danger Assessment for Immigrant Women (DA-I)

Hsiu-Fen Lin, Iris Cardenas, Jill T. Messing, Veronica P. S. Njie-Carr et al.
Violence Against Women
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
article

The Predictive Validity of the Danger Assessment for Immigrant Women (DA-I)

Hsiu-Fen Lin, Iris Cardenas, Jill T. Messing, Veronica P. S. Njie-Carr, Jacquelyn Campbell, Karin Wachter, Cherra Mathis, Bushra Sabri, Cecilia Suarez
article en

Abstract

Immigrant survivors of intimate partner violence (IPV) face particular risks and have unique strengths; IPV risk assessments must account for diverse lived experiences. This validation study of the Danger Assessment for Immigrant (DA-I) women assessed risk factors and experiences of IPV across four timepoints among immigrant IPV survivors from diverse world regions (<i>n</i> = 122). The Receiver Operating Characteristic Area Under the Curve assessed the predictive validity of the DA-I, which ranged from .794 to .892 in the full sample and .652-.943 in regional subsamples. Used appropriately, the DA-I offers survivors an opportunity to make knowledgeable and empowered decisions regarding their safety.

Violence Against Women
University of Central Florida (US), University of Maryland, Baltimore (US), University of Kentucky (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), Arizona State University (US), University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.