Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of vaginal and sublingual low-dose misoprostol versus vaginal dinoprostone for labor ınduction: A retrospective cohort study

According to the results of the study, low-dose vaginal or sublingual misoprostol was found to be more effective and safer than vaginal dinoprostone pessary in labor induction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0336025
Primary Topic
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of vaginal and sublingual low-dose misoprostol versus vaginal dinoprostone for labor ınduction: A retrospective cohort study

Elmin Eminov, Ayşe Emi̇nov
PLoS ONE
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
article

Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of vaginal and sublingual low-dose misoprostol versus vaginal dinoprostone for labor ınduction: A retrospective cohort study

Elmin Eminov, Ayşe Emi̇nov
article en

Abstract

According to the results of the study, low-dose vaginal or sublingual misoprostol was found to be more effective and safer than vaginal dinoprostone pessary in labor induction.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(10)
Kocaeli Üniversitesi (TR), Düzce Üniversitesi (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.