Energy retention from plant leaves by soil along an elevational gradient in arid mountain ecosystems

• Energy density conversion ratio (ED SOM/Leaf-OM ) is < 1 in warm-dry areas. • ED SOM/Leaf-OM remains 1 in cold-wet areas. • ED SOM/Leaf-OM decreases with the Exo2/Exo1 ratio of plant leaf in cold-wet areas. • ED SOM/Leaf-OM decreases with the Exo2/Exo1 ratio of soil organic matter in warm-dry areas. Plant photosynthetic products are microbially and chemically transformed and retained as soil organic matter (SOM), which is essential for ecosystem functioning, particularly in the detritusphere. The energy quantity (EQ) of an organic substance, defined as the net energy release per gram of the sample, depends on its OM content and the energy density (ED, the net energy release per gram of OM). During the transformation of plant leaves to SOM, both the energy quantity retention ratio (EQ Soil/Leaf , the ratio of soil’s EQ to leaves’ EQ) and the OM retention ratio (OM Soil/Leaf , the ratio of SOM to leaves’ OM) are consistently less than one, reflecting the loss of OM as CO 2 and coupled heat dissipation. However, how the energy density conversion ratio (ED SOM/Leaf-OM ) changes and its influence on EQ Soil/Leaf ratio remain unknown. Here, we 1) examined the ED SOM/Leaf-OM ratio along an elevation gradient (481–3035 m), where environmental conditions shift from warm-dry to cold-wet, and 2) explored how the ED SOM/Leaf-OM ratio was influenced by chemical composition (e.g., the H/C and C/N ratios of plant leaves, the ratio of stable-to-labile OM thermal pool (Exo2/Exo1)), climate, and edaphic factors. The ED SOM/Leaf-OM ratio was < 1 (0.7 ± 0.04) in warm-dry areas, indicating the decrease in OM’s energy density from plant leaves to SOM, whereas it remained 1 (1.0 ± 0.1) in cold-wet areas. In warm-dry areas, the ED SOM/Leaf-OM ratio decreased with the ratio of themal pools Exo2/Exo1 of SOM due to the protection of low-energy–density OM by Fe/Al oxides. Conversely, in cold-wet areas, ED SOM/Leaf-OM declined with increasing Exo2/Exo1 ratio of leaf, which was featured by low H/C and high C/N ratio. The ED SOM/Leaf-OM ratio modulates energy retention as OM Soil/Leaf in cold-wet areas, underlining the dynamics of SOM energy beyond mass loss. This study highlights that energy retention during SOM formation is environment-sensitive, mediated by two mechanisms: mineral protection in warm-dry areas versus biochemical transformation in cold-wet areas. We recommend integrating energy and mass flux assessments to better understand OM decomposition, stabilization, and ecosystem carbon storage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geoderma
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2025.117566
Primary Topic
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Energy retention from plant leaves by soil along an elevational gradient in arid mountain ecosystems

Shuihong Yao, Ekaterina Filimonenko, Wenting Feng, Litao Lin et al.
Geoderma
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
article

Energy retention from plant leaves by soil along an elevational gradient in arid mountain ecosystems

Shuihong Yao, Ekaterina Filimonenko, Wenting Feng, Litao Lin, Xiaofang Ji, Yakov Kuzyakov, Min Zhang, Chaoqun Wang, Yugang Wang, D. Xing, Shikui Dong
article en

Abstract

• Energy density conversion ratio (ED SOM/Leaf-OM ) is < 1 in warm-dry areas. • ED SOM/Leaf-OM remains 1 in cold-wet areas. • ED SOM/Leaf-OM decreases with the Exo2/Exo1 ratio of plant leaf in cold-wet areas. • ED SOM/Leaf-OM decreases with the Exo2/Exo1 ratio of soil organic matter in warm-dry areas. Plant photosynthetic products are microbially and chemically transformed and retained as soil organic matter (SOM), which is essential for ecosystem functioning, particularly in the detritusphere. The energy quantity (EQ) of an organic substance, defined as the net energy release per gram of the sample, depends on its OM content and the energy density (ED, the net energy release per gram of OM). During the transformation of plant leaves to SOM, both the energy quantity retention ratio (EQ Soil/Leaf , the ratio of soil’s EQ to leaves’ EQ) and the OM retention ratio (OM Soil/Leaf , the ratio of SOM to leaves’ OM) are consistently less than one, reflecting the loss of OM as CO 2 and coupled heat dissipation. However, how the energy density conversion ratio (ED SOM/Leaf-OM ) changes and its influence on EQ Soil/Leaf ratio remain unknown. Here, we 1) examined the ED SOM/Leaf-OM ratio along an elevation gradient (481–3035 m), where environmental conditions shift from warm-dry to cold-wet, and 2) explored how the ED SOM/Leaf-OM ratio was influenced by chemical composition (e.g., the H/C and C/N ratios of plant leaves, the ratio of stable-to-labile OM thermal pool (Exo2/Exo1)), climate, and edaphic factors. The ED SOM/Leaf-OM ratio was < 1 (0.7 ± 0.04) in warm-dry areas, indicating the decrease in OM’s energy density from plant leaves to SOM, whereas it remained 1 (1.0 ± 0.1) in cold-wet areas. In warm-dry areas, the ED SOM/Leaf-OM ratio decreased with the ratio of themal pools Exo2/Exo1 of SOM due to the protection of low-energy–density OM by Fe/Al oxides. Conversely, in cold-wet areas, ED SOM/Leaf-OM declined with increasing Exo2/Exo1 ratio of leaf, which was featured by low H/C and high C/N ratio. The ED SOM/Leaf-OM ratio modulates energy retention as OM Soil/Leaf in cold-wet areas, underlining the dynamics of SOM energy beyond mass loss. This study highlights that energy retention during SOM formation is environment-sensitive, mediated by two mechanisms: mineral protection in warm-dry areas versus biochemical transformation in cold-wet areas. We recommend integrating energy and mass flux assessments to better understand OM decomposition, stabilization, and ecosystem carbon storage.

GeodermaVol. 463
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RU), University of British Columbia (CA), University of Liège (BE), Zhejiang University of Science and Technology (CN), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech (BE), Beijing Forestry University (CN), Sirius University of Science and Technology (RU), Institute of Ecology and Geography (MD), Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography (CN), Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning (CN), Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN), Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences (CN), University of Göttingen (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.