Reliable evaluation for the AI-enabled intrusion detection system from data perspective

As the primary link in cybersecurity, the intrusion detection system (IDS) is of indispensable importance. Many studies have proposed sophisticated artificial intelligence (AI) models to detect intrusion behavior from a large amount of data, yet they have ignored the fact that poor data quality has a direct impact on the performance of IDS. The poor data quality is mainly attributed to the interference and damage, such as data tampering, poisoning, and corruption, which leads to decision-making deviations, triggering a serious trust crisis of model application. This paper proposes a multi-indicator comprehensive evaluation method (MICEM) to ensure the reliability of AI decision-making from data perspective. First, several evaluation indicators are established to analyze the potential risks that intrusion detection data may face from the different dimensions, and specific quantitative methods are provided. Second, a comprehensive evaluation is conducted based on the results of each indicator to determine the quality of the intrusion detection data as a whole, thus guaranteeing the usability and reliability of AI-enabled IDS. Finally, the effectiveness and practicality of the proposed MICEM are fully verified by evaluating the benchmark-CICIDS2017 dataset and the real intrusion detection dataset.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0334157
Primary Topic
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reliable evaluation for the AI-enabled intrusion detection system from data perspective

Shen He, Jia Chen, Huijuan Zhang, Kai Yang et al.
PLoS ONE
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
article

Reliable evaluation for the AI-enabled intrusion detection system from data perspective

Shen He, Jia Chen, Huijuan Zhang, Kai Yang, Peng Ran
article en

Abstract

As the primary link in cybersecurity, the intrusion detection system (IDS) is of indispensable importance. Many studies have proposed sophisticated artificial intelligence (AI) models to detect intrusion behavior from a large amount of data, yet they have ignored the fact that poor data quality has a direct impact on the performance of IDS. The poor data quality is mainly attributed to the interference and damage, such as data tampering, poisoning, and corruption, which leads to decision-making deviations, triggering a serious trust crisis of model application. This paper proposes a multi-indicator comprehensive evaluation method (MICEM) to ensure the reliability of AI decision-making from data perspective. First, several evaluation indicators are established to analyze the potential risks that intrusion detection data may face from the different dimensions, and specific quantitative methods are provided. Second, a comprehensive evaluation is conducted based on the results of each indicator to determine the quality of the intrusion detection data as a whole, thus guaranteeing the usability and reliability of AI-enabled IDS. Finally, the effectiveness and practicality of the proposed MICEM are fully verified by evaluating the benchmark-CICIDS2017 dataset and the real intrusion detection dataset.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(10)
China Mobile (China) (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Reliable evaluation for the AI-enabled intrusion detection system from data perspective — Shen He, Jia Chen, et al. · PLoS ONE (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS