“Protected profit” and value sharing to boost non-interfering investment, employee ownership and democratic businesses

Purpose Employee ownership (EO) and profit sharing have numerous benefits. Employee Ownership Trusts (EOTs) are proliferating, but EO could grow faster by harnessing “non-interfering”, risk-sharing investment. Companies with common ownership (such as EOTs) are at risk, longer-term, from inadequate equity, which could lead to under-investment, slower growth or demutualisation. Other private businesses are also held back by substantial gaps in non-interfering, risk-sharing investment. Design/methodology/approach Existing financial instruments do not meet these challenges. We design a viable alternative, balancing the needs of entrepreneurs, workers and investors. Findings “Protected profit” sharing between workers and investors achieves this balance: guaranteed “base” pay is capped at a pre-agreed average level; profit-sharing pay and payments to loans, bonds or shares are all agreed fractions of “protected profit” (= revenue – non-pay costs – base pay costs). This aligns interests between workers, entrepreneurs and investors, and together with restricted voting rights, solves the principal-agent/risk-control problems, allowing reward-/risk-sharing equity investment. Practical implications Sharing protected profit allows sustainable employee/trust (or entrepreneur) control, while increasing liquidity, reducing the risk of “degeneration” and expanding the range of firms that can transition sustainably to control for/by employees. It also enables private firms in general to attract capital, boosting productivity and growth. Social implications Our mechanism removes the “need” for exorbitant executive pay (a driver of inequality), is compatible with Islamic finance and will catalyse business, thus civic, democratisation. Originality/value “Protected profit” sharing prevents whoever controls a company from unilaterally raising wages at the expense of investors, while protecting and incentivising everyone in the firm.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Participation and Employee Ownership
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jpeo-12-2024-0033
Primary Topic
Cooperative Studies and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Protected profit” and value sharing to boost non-interfering investment, employee ownership and democratic businesses

Guy Major, Jonathan Preminger
Journal of Participation and Employee Ownership
Cooperative Studies and Economics
article

“Protected profit” and value sharing to boost non-interfering investment, employee ownership and democratic businesses

Guy Major, Jonathan Preminger
article en

Abstract

Purpose Employee ownership (EO) and profit sharing have numerous benefits. Employee Ownership Trusts (EOTs) are proliferating, but EO could grow faster by harnessing “non-interfering”, risk-sharing investment. Companies with common ownership (such as EOTs) are at risk, longer-term, from inadequate equity, which could lead to under-investment, slower growth or demutualisation. Other private businesses are also held back by substantial gaps in non-interfering, risk-sharing investment. Design/methodology/approach Existing financial instruments do not meet these challenges. We design a viable alternative, balancing the needs of entrepreneurs, workers and investors. Findings “Protected profit” sharing between workers and investors achieves this balance: guaranteed “base” pay is capped at a pre-agreed average level; profit-sharing pay and payments to loans, bonds or shares are all agreed fractions of “protected profit” (= revenue – non-pay costs – base pay costs). This aligns interests between workers, entrepreneurs and investors, and together with restricted voting rights, solves the principal-agent/risk-control problems, allowing reward-/risk-sharing equity investment. Practical implications Sharing protected profit allows sustainable employee/trust (or entrepreneur) control, while increasing liquidity, reducing the risk of “degeneration” and expanding the range of firms that can transition sustainably to control for/by employees. It also enables private firms in general to attract capital, boosting productivity and growth. Social implications Our mechanism removes the “need” for exorbitant executive pay (a driver of inequality), is compatible with Islamic finance and will catalyse business, thus civic, democratisation. Originality/value “Protected profit” sharing prevents whoever controls a company from unilaterally raising wages at the expense of investors, while protecting and incentivising everyone in the firm.

Journal of Participation and Employee OwnershipVol. 8(3)
Cardiff University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Cooperative Studies and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.