Who Do Voters Blame in Times of Crisis? Electoral Accountability in Brazil's Federalism During COVID-19

This study explores electoral accountability in federative systems during crises, with a focus on the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil. It analyses how voters assign blame across government levels in contexts of fragmented responsibilities. Employing a mixed-methods approach, the research integrates a difference-in-differences design to examine the impact of COVID-19 mortality on electoral outcomes and multinomial logistic regression on survey data to assess voters’ perceptions. The findings indicate that voters penalised the president in municipalities with higher COVID-19 mortality rates, while governors were shielded. Survey results underscore the importance of information, showing that voters who were more informed about federal actions attributed greater blame to the president. These results demonstrate that voters rely on available information to navigate the complexities of multilevel governance, focusing accountability on actors with higher visibility and perceived authority, thereby emphasising the pivotal role of federal executives in times of crisis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Politics in Latin America
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/1866802x251390577
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who Do Voters Blame in Times of Crisis? Electoral Accountability in Brazil's Federalism During COVID-19

Lucas Falcão, Fernando Luiz Abrucio, Rayane Vieira Rodrigues
Journal of Politics in Latin America
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
article

Who Do Voters Blame in Times of Crisis? Electoral Accountability in Brazil's Federalism During COVID-19

Lucas Falcão, Fernando Luiz Abrucio, Rayane Vieira Rodrigues
article en

Abstract

This study explores electoral accountability in federative systems during crises, with a focus on the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil. It analyses how voters assign blame across government levels in contexts of fragmented responsibilities. Employing a mixed-methods approach, the research integrates a difference-in-differences design to examine the impact of COVID-19 mortality on electoral outcomes and multinomial logistic regression on survey data to assess voters’ perceptions. The findings indicate that voters penalised the president in municipalities with higher COVID-19 mortality rates, while governors were shielded. Survey results underscore the importance of information, showing that voters who were more informed about federal actions attributed greater blame to the president. These results demonstrate that voters rely on available information to navigate the complexities of multilevel governance, focusing accountability on actors with higher visibility and perceived authority, thereby emphasising the pivotal role of federal executives in times of crisis.

Journal of Politics in Latin AmericaVol. 18(1)
Fundação Getulio Vargas (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Who Do Voters Blame in Times of Crisis? Electoral Accountability in Brazil's Federalism During COVID-19 — Lucas Falcão, Fernando Luiz Abrucio, et al. · Journal of Politics in Latin America (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS