Safety and Utility of Functional Dynamic Cervical Spine Radiographs in Select Subaxial Cervical Injury With Incomplete or No Neurological Deficit: Hybrid Retrospective and Prospective Observational Study

Study DesignHybrid retrospective and prospective observational study.ObjectivesTo evaluate the safety and clinical utility of Functional Dynamic Cervical Spine Radiographs (FDCSR) under supervision in assessing instability of subaxial cervical spine in non-obtunded cervical spine trauma patients with incomplete or no neurological deficits.MethodsWe reviewed records and radiographs of patients with traumatic cervical spine injury from January 2014 to December 2017 (retrospectively) and January 2018 to December 2018 (prospectively). Inclusion criteria: (1) Patients with intact neurology and stable injuries on static radiographs (<11° angulation, <3.5 mm translation) who underwent FDCSR; (2) Patients with neurological deficits and degenerative/congenital canal stenosis without discernible injuries on static radiographs, suggestive of hyperextension injuries. Outcomes assessed included X-ray adequacy, pre- and post-procedure neurological status, pain/spasm during imaging, and evidence of instability.ResultsOf 6890 patients evaluated, 364 met inclusion criteria (258 retrospective, 86 prospective). Pre-FDCSR neurological status was AIS-B (1.1%), AIS-C (8%), AIS-D (12.6%), and normal (78.3%). No neurological deterioration occurred post-FDCSR. X-rays were adequate in 202 cases (55.5%) and inadequate in 162. Instability was detected in 4.95% of adequate (n = 10) and 11.7% of inadequate (n = 19) FDCSR studies, with an overall instability rate of 7.97% (n = 29).ConclusionsFDCSR, when performed under appropriate supervision, is a safe and effective adjunct for detecting cervical spine instability in select trauma patients. It can identify occult instability even in suboptimal studies, supporting its utility in the evaluation of patients with equivocal findings on static imaging.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Spine Journal
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682251392880
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Safety and Utility of Functional Dynamic Cervical Spine Radiographs in Select Subaxial Cervical Injury With Incomplete or No Neurological Deficit: Hybrid Retrospective and Prospective Observational Study

Jeevan Kumar Sharma, Harvinder Singh Chhabra, Padmini Yadav, Anuj Gupta et al.
1 citations
Global Spine Journal
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
2.01
article

Safety and Utility of Functional Dynamic Cervical Spine Radiographs in Select Subaxial Cervical Injury With Incomplete or No Neurological Deficit: Hybrid Retrospective and Prospective Observational Study

Jeevan Kumar Sharma, Harvinder Singh Chhabra, Padmini Yadav, Anuj Gupta, Kalyan Kumar Varma Kalidindi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Study DesignHybrid retrospective and prospective observational study.ObjectivesTo evaluate the safety and clinical utility of Functional Dynamic Cervical Spine Radiographs (FDCSR) under supervision in assessing instability of subaxial cervical spine in non-obtunded cervical spine trauma patients with incomplete or no neurological deficits.MethodsWe reviewed records and radiographs of patients with traumatic cervical spine injury from January 2014 to December 2017 (retrospectively) and January 2018 to December 2018 (prospectively). Inclusion criteria: (1) Patients with intact neurology and stable injuries on static radiographs (<11° angulation, <3.5 mm translation) who underwent FDCSR; (2) Patients with neurological deficits and degenerative/congenital canal stenosis without discernible injuries on static radiographs, suggestive of hyperextension injuries. Outcomes assessed included X-ray adequacy, pre- and post-procedure neurological status, pain/spasm during imaging, and evidence of instability.ResultsOf 6890 patients evaluated, 364 met inclusion criteria (258 retrospective, 86 prospective). Pre-FDCSR neurological status was AIS-B (1.1%), AIS-C (8%), AIS-D (12.6%), and normal (78.3%). No neurological deterioration occurred post-FDCSR. X-rays were adequate in 202 cases (55.5%) and inadequate in 162. Instability was detected in 4.95% of adequate (n = 10) and 11.7% of inadequate (n = 19) FDCSR studies, with an overall instability rate of 7.97% (n = 29).ConclusionsFDCSR, when performed under appropriate supervision, is a safe and effective adjunct for detecting cervical spine instability in select trauma patients. It can identify occult instability even in suboptimal studies, supporting its utility in the evaluation of patients with equivocal findings on static imaging.

Global Spine Journal
Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute (IN), Jamia Hamdard (IN), Max Super Speciality Hospital (IN), Indian Spinal Injuries Centre (IN), Institute of Medical Sciences (IN), All India Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.