Intersectionality in interregnum: A conjunctural keyword analysis

Does intersectionality speak theoretically and politically to our current moment, to its multiple and interrelated crises? Does its explanatory force match its claims? Is it of any use in the service of building connected struggles to dismantle the matrix of exploitative and oppressive power structures and relations that it purports to examine in their entangled complexities? And, crucially, does it help us envision and build alternatives to a present that is clearly not working? This paper aims to contribute to an open-ended, collaborative project critically engaging intersectionality – discerning what to discard, retain, or rework so that it may serve as a decisively counter-hegemonic tool today. This requires confronting intersectionality's theoretical gaps, as well as its political dissonance. The article's necessarily limited input consists of proposing a method and applying it to salient definitional and political challenges to intersectionality's conceptual coherence and counter-hegemonic potential.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dialogues in sociology.
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/29768667251389068
Primary Topic
Feminist Theory and Gender Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intersectionality in interregnum: A conjunctural keyword analysis

Sirma Bilge
Dialogues in sociology.
Feminist Theory and Gender Studies
article

Intersectionality in interregnum: A conjunctural keyword analysis

Sirma Bilge
article en

Abstract

Does intersectionality speak theoretically and politically to our current moment, to its multiple and interrelated crises? Does its explanatory force match its claims? Is it of any use in the service of building connected struggles to dismantle the matrix of exploitative and oppressive power structures and relations that it purports to examine in their entangled complexities? And, crucially, does it help us envision and build alternatives to a present that is clearly not working? This paper aims to contribute to an open-ended, collaborative project critically engaging intersectionality – discerning what to discard, retain, or rework so that it may serve as a decisively counter-hegemonic tool today. This requires confronting intersectionality's theoretical gaps, as well as its political dissonance. The article's necessarily limited input consists of proposing a method and applying it to salient definitional and political challenges to intersectionality's conceptual coherence and counter-hegemonic potential.

Dialogues in sociology.
Université de Montréal (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Feminist Theory and Gender Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.