Why more social interactions lead to more polarization in societies
Over the past two decades, the number of close social connections increased substantially, at least by a factor of two. At the same time, societal opinions have become increasingly polarized in many Western countries. To explore whether these trends could be connected, we employ a simple computational model of society, where people-within their social networks-continuously compare and update their opinions. Here, we show that the model that is known to realistically capture both homophily and social balance exhibits a phase transition phenomenon where, above a critical social connectivity, an explosive transition toward strong polarization must occur. The model allows us to understand the empirical inflation of polarization during the last decades as a function of the observed increased values of social connectivity. In the presence of a small fraction of synchronized influencers, the transition becomes continuous; however, polarization then appears at lower connectivities. We discuss the implications of the presence of a phase transition in social polarization.
Authors
- Jan O. Korbel (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5371-5320)
- Stefan Thurner (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2495-6819)
- Markus Hofer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0258-2415)
Institutions
- Santa Fe Institute (US)
- Complexity Science Hub (AT)
- Institute for Complex Systems (IT)
- Data Management (Italy) (IT)
- Medical University of Vienna (AT)
- New England Complex Systems Institute (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2025-10-31
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2517530122
- Citations
- 5
- Primary Topic
- Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 6.62
Funders
- Austrian Science Fund