Why more social interactions lead to more polarization in societies

Over the past two decades, the number of close social connections increased substantially, at least by a factor of two. At the same time, societal opinions have become increasingly polarized in many Western countries. To explore whether these trends could be connected, we employ a simple computational model of society, where people-within their social networks-continuously compare and update their opinions. Here, we show that the model that is known to realistically capture both homophily and social balance exhibits a phase transition phenomenon where, above a critical social connectivity, an explosive transition toward strong polarization must occur. The model allows us to understand the empirical inflation of polarization during the last decades as a function of the observed increased values of social connectivity. In the presence of a small fraction of synchronized influencers, the transition becomes continuous; however, polarization then appears at lower connectivities. We discuss the implications of the presence of a phase transition in social polarization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2517530122
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.62

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why more social interactions lead to more polarization in societies

Jan O. Korbel, Stefan Thurner, Markus Hofer
5 citations
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
6.62
article

Why more social interactions lead to more polarization in societies

Jan O. Korbel, Stefan Thurner, Markus Hofer
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Over the past two decades, the number of close social connections increased substantially, at least by a factor of two. At the same time, societal opinions have become increasingly polarized in many Western countries. To explore whether these trends could be connected, we employ a simple computational model of society, where people-within their social networks-continuously compare and update their opinions. Here, we show that the model that is known to realistically capture both homophily and social balance exhibits a phase transition phenomenon where, above a critical social connectivity, an explosive transition toward strong polarization must occur. The model allows us to understand the empirical inflation of polarization during the last decades as a function of the observed increased values of social connectivity. In the presence of a small fraction of synchronized influencers, the transition becomes continuous; however, polarization then appears at lower connectivities. We discuss the implications of the presence of a phase transition in social polarization.

Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesVol. 122(44)
Santa Fe Institute (US), Complexity Science Hub (AT), Institute for Complex Systems (IT), Data Management (Italy) (IT), Medical University of Vienna (AT), New England Complex Systems Institute (US)
Austrian Science Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
6.62
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.