Factors influencing trustworthiness and perceived biases of medical information and genetic testing for Black and White Americans

Ensuring diversity in genomic research is crucial to address disparities in healthcare benefits experienced by Black Americans and other minority groups. Despite progress in promoting diversity, Black Americans remain underrepresented in most genetic studies, resulting in unequal access to the benefits of genetic medicine. This study investigates trusted sources of medical and genetic testing information among Black and White Americans, identifying key factors that influence trust and participation in genetic research. Using an online survey of 1,018 participants (Black Americans n = 500, White Americans n = 518), we analyzed trust and bias ratings across various sources, including medical providers, genetic counselors, and social media. Medical providers emerged as the most trusted source for both medical and genetic information across racial groups. In terms of bias, social media was viewed as most biased and medical providers as least biased across both groups. However, Black Americans reported significantly lower trust in medical providers and scientific literature compared to White Americans. Furthermore, Black Americans expressed a stronger preference for receiving medical information from individuals of the same race or ethnicity. These findings highlight the importance of tailoring communication outlets and strategies to address the specific trust concerns of underrepresented populations. Efforts to engage Black Americans in genetic research may benefit from increased involvement of medical providers and genetic counselors, improved transparency, and culturally relevant communication. By addressing these factors, the research community can work towards reducing disparities and promoting equitable access to the benefits of genetic medicine.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS Genetics
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1011800
Citations
1
Primary Topic
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors influencing trustworthiness and perceived biases of medical information and genetic testing for Black and White Americans

Thomas May, Mariko Nakano‐Okuno, Crystal Lederhos Smith, Nita A. Limdi et al.
1 citations
PLoS Genetics
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
1.82
article

Factors influencing trustworthiness and perceived biases of medical information and genetic testing for Black and White Americans

Thomas May, Mariko Nakano‐Okuno, Crystal Lederhos Smith, Nita A. Limdi, Mary Carol Barks, McKenna Kobalter, Ellen Weger Romesburg, Brian Connor Stark
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Ensuring diversity in genomic research is crucial to address disparities in healthcare benefits experienced by Black Americans and other minority groups. Despite progress in promoting diversity, Black Americans remain underrepresented in most genetic studies, resulting in unequal access to the benefits of genetic medicine. This study investigates trusted sources of medical and genetic testing information among Black and White Americans, identifying key factors that influence trust and participation in genetic research. Using an online survey of 1,018 participants (Black Americans n = 500, White Americans n = 518), we analyzed trust and bias ratings across various sources, including medical providers, genetic counselors, and social media. Medical providers emerged as the most trusted source for both medical and genetic information across racial groups. In terms of bias, social media was viewed as most biased and medical providers as least biased across both groups. However, Black Americans reported significantly lower trust in medical providers and scientific literature compared to White Americans. Furthermore, Black Americans expressed a stronger preference for receiving medical information from individuals of the same race or ethnicity. These findings highlight the importance of tailoring communication outlets and strategies to address the specific trust concerns of underrepresented populations. Efforts to engage Black Americans in genetic research may benefit from increased involvement of medical providers and genetic counselors, improved transparency, and culturally relevant communication. By addressing these factors, the research community can work towards reducing disparities and promoting equitable access to the benefits of genetic medicine.

PLoS GeneticsVol. 21(10)
Washington State University Spokane (US), University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
1.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.