Physician-level variability in adopting opportunistic salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention at the time of hysterectomy

Opportunistic salpingectomy reduces ovarian cancer risk. To examine heterogeneity among physicians in their adoption of opportunistic salpingectomy in hysterectomy practice, we identified 33,401 non-pregnant patients aged 18 to 49 years in the Premier Healthcare Database who underwent inpatient hysterectomy for benign indications without oophorectomy in 2011-2021 (operated on by 1297 physicians). Opportunistic salpingectomy was measured by procedure codes reflecting bilateral complete removal of fallopian tubes. Even after adjusting for patient age, surgical route, indication, overweight/obesity, smoking status, and co-morbidities, opportunistic salpingectomy use varied widely among physicians. A finite mixture model identified 2 distinct adoption patterns among physicians: 1 exhibiting low adoption (average risk-adjusted rate of opportunistic salpingectomy increased from 0.01% in 2011 to 43.3% in 2021) and the other exhibiting high adoption (10.5% in 2011 to 81.3% in 2021). They accounted for 39.3% and 60.7% of the physicians, respectively. Physicians at teaching hospitals or in the northeast or west were more likely, whereas physicians having more Medicaid patients were less likely, to follow a high-adoption pattern. Physicians' adoption patterns did not differ by hysterectomy volume, hospital size, urban/rural location, or composition of their patients' race/ethnicity and marital status. These results highlight variation among physicians in their level and speed of adopting opportunistic salpingectomy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Gynecological Cancer
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.102769
Primary Topic
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Physician-level variability in adopting opportunistic salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention at the time of hysterectomy

Erica S. Spatz, Craig Evan Pollack, Jason D. Wright, Xiao Xu et al.
International Journal of Gynecological Cancer
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
article

Physician-level variability in adopting opportunistic salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention at the time of hysterectomy

Erica S. Spatz, Craig Evan Pollack, Jason D. Wright, Xiao Xu, Cary P. Gross, Vrunda Desai
article en

Abstract

Opportunistic salpingectomy reduces ovarian cancer risk. To examine heterogeneity among physicians in their adoption of opportunistic salpingectomy in hysterectomy practice, we identified 33,401 non-pregnant patients aged 18 to 49 years in the Premier Healthcare Database who underwent inpatient hysterectomy for benign indications without oophorectomy in 2011-2021 (operated on by 1297 physicians). Opportunistic salpingectomy was measured by procedure codes reflecting bilateral complete removal of fallopian tubes. Even after adjusting for patient age, surgical route, indication, overweight/obesity, smoking status, and co-morbidities, opportunistic salpingectomy use varied widely among physicians. A finite mixture model identified 2 distinct adoption patterns among physicians: 1 exhibiting low adoption (average risk-adjusted rate of opportunistic salpingectomy increased from 0.01% in 2011 to 43.3% in 2021) and the other exhibiting high adoption (10.5% in 2011 to 81.3% in 2021). They accounted for 39.3% and 60.7% of the physicians, respectively. Physicians at teaching hospitals or in the northeast or west were more likely, whereas physicians having more Medicaid patients were less likely, to follow a high-adoption pattern. Physicians' adoption patterns did not differ by hysterectomy volume, hospital size, urban/rural location, or composition of their patients' race/ethnicity and marital status. These results highlight variation among physicians in their level and speed of adopting opportunistic salpingectomy.

International Journal of Gynecological CancerVol. 36(1)
Johns Hopkins University (US), Yale University (US), CooperSurgical (United States) (US), Columbia University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.