Predicting EU orchard farmers' adoption intentions for pesticide-reducing innovations using an extended theory of planned behavior

Reducing synthetic pesticide use is central to the EU Green Deal. However, with legislative progress stalled, farmers increasingly bear the responsibility for implementing pesticide reduction. This highlights the need to understand how decisions are made and what shapes farmers' intentions to adopt technologies that reduced pesticide use, particularly in orchard systems where pesticide dependence remains high despite the availability of promising alternatives. This study examines stakeholder roles in orchard pest management, identifies key drivers of farmers’ adoption intentions, and develops a tool to predict adoption likelihood. A mixed-methods approach was applied, combining expert interviews (n = 16) and a structured survey of orchard farmers (n = 354). We extended the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) by incorporating three additional constructs: perceived cost, relative advantage of current practices, and perceived ease of use, all based on established behavioral theories. Results show that decision-making involves multiple stakeholders and is influenced by factors such as farm size, ownership structure, and external pressures. Meanwhile, structural equation modeling shows that attitudes and perceived ease of use significantly boost adoption intentions. In contrast, perceived cost and the relative advantage of current practices serve as barriers. Subjective norms and perceived behavioral control were not significant predictors. Based on these findings, a web-based adoption intention predictive tool was developed to support stakeholders in assessing adoption likelihood. The study offers practical insights for reducing adoption barriers, strengthening positive attitudes toward innovation, and supporting sustainable pest management in orchard systems. • Pest control decisions in orchards involve multiple stakeholders beyond farmers. • Attitude strongly predicts farmers' intentions to adopt pesticide-reducing technologies. • Perceived cost and relative advantage of current methods' hinder adoption intentions. • Subjective norms and perceived behavioral control have less impact on adoption intentions. • AIPT helps to predict farmers' likelihood to adopt pesticide-reducing innovations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Crop Protection
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2025.107460
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Genetically Modified Organisms Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.75

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting EU orchard farmers' adoption intentions for pesticide-reducing innovations using an extended theory of planned behavior

Zein Kallas, Noah Larvoe, Muhammad Adzran Che Mustapa, Felicidad De Herralde
1 citations
Crop Protection
Genetically Modified Organisms Research
1.75
article

Predicting EU orchard farmers' adoption intentions for pesticide-reducing innovations using an extended theory of planned behavior

Zein Kallas, Noah Larvoe, Muhammad Adzran Che Mustapa, Felicidad De Herralde
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Reducing synthetic pesticide use is central to the EU Green Deal. However, with legislative progress stalled, farmers increasingly bear the responsibility for implementing pesticide reduction. This highlights the need to understand how decisions are made and what shapes farmers' intentions to adopt technologies that reduced pesticide use, particularly in orchard systems where pesticide dependence remains high despite the availability of promising alternatives. This study examines stakeholder roles in orchard pest management, identifies key drivers of farmers’ adoption intentions, and develops a tool to predict adoption likelihood. A mixed-methods approach was applied, combining expert interviews (n = 16) and a structured survey of orchard farmers (n = 354). We extended the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) by incorporating three additional constructs: perceived cost, relative advantage of current practices, and perceived ease of use, all based on established behavioral theories. Results show that decision-making involves multiple stakeholders and is influenced by factors such as farm size, ownership structure, and external pressures. Meanwhile, structural equation modeling shows that attitudes and perceived ease of use significantly boost adoption intentions. In contrast, perceived cost and the relative advantage of current practices serve as barriers. Subjective norms and perceived behavioral control were not significant predictors. Based on these findings, a web-based adoption intention predictive tool was developed to support stakeholders in assessing adoption likelihood. The study offers practical insights for reducing adoption barriers, strengthening positive attitudes toward innovation, and supporting sustainable pest management in orchard systems. • Pest control decisions in orchards involve multiple stakeholders beyond farmers. • Attitude strongly predicts farmers' intentions to adopt pesticide-reducing technologies. • Perceived cost and relative advantage of current methods' hinder adoption intentions. • Subjective norms and perceived behavioral control have less impact on adoption intentions. • AIPT helps to predict farmers' likelihood to adopt pesticide-reducing innovations.

Crop ProtectionVol. 200
Institute of Agrifood Research and Technology (ES), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (ES)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Genetically Modified Organisms Research
1.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.