Rethinking AI Implementation in Criminal Justice

Abstract Artificial intelligence’s integration into U.S. criminal justice systems is now a given rather than a possibility. The question now expands from whether AI should be used to what the appropriate role for AI is in criminal justice and the guardrails that need to be established, especially in these still early stages of development. More specifically, is it proper for AI technology to be tested in the first instance on the general public or incarcerated individuals when the outcomes are still uncertain? This essay argues that if criminal justice system actors choose to use AI, a more responsible place to focus artificial intelligence experimentation may be on improving accountability of the criminal justice system itself. Using AI technology with appropriate governance structures to monitor and improve accountability of criminal justice system actors could provide a breakthrough, addressing the lack of robust mechanisms to provide timely systemic oversight. By starting on systems and system actors instead of the general public or people already caught in the system, AI would be developed in a context where errors of technology development can be mitigated by strong existing protections that have eluded other accountability practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Federal Sentencing Reporter
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1215/10539867-11834178
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rethinking AI Implementation in Criminal Justice

Ed Chung, Karen Tan
Federal Sentencing Reporter
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Rethinking AI Implementation in Criminal Justice

Ed Chung, Karen Tan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Artificial intelligence’s integration into U.S. criminal justice systems is now a given rather than a possibility. The question now expands from whether AI should be used to what the appropriate role for AI is in criminal justice and the guardrails that need to be established, especially in these still early stages of development. More specifically, is it proper for AI technology to be tested in the first instance on the general public or incarcerated individuals when the outcomes are still uncertain? This essay argues that if criminal justice system actors choose to use AI, a more responsible place to focus artificial intelligence experimentation may be on improving accountability of the criminal justice system itself. Using AI technology with appropriate governance structures to monitor and improve accountability of criminal justice system actors could provide a breakthrough, addressing the lack of robust mechanisms to provide timely systemic oversight. By starting on systems and system actors instead of the general public or people already caught in the system, AI would be developed in a context where errors of technology development can be mitigated by strong existing protections that have eluded other accountability practices.

Federal Sentencing ReporterVol. 37(3-4)
Vera Institute of Justice (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.