Benchmarking scientific machine-learning approaches for flow prediction around complex geometries

Rapid and accurate simulations of fluid dynamics around complicated geometric bodies are critical in a variety of engineering and scientific applications. While scientific machine learning (SciML) has shown considerable promise, most studies in this field are limited to simple geometries. This paper addresses this gap by benchmarking diverse SciML models, including neural operators and vision transformer-based foundation models, for fluid flow prediction over intricate geometries. We evaluate the impact of geometric representations-Signed Distance Fields (SDF) and binary masks-on model accuracy, scalability, and generalization using a high-fidelity dataset of steady-state flow over complex geometries. We introduce a unified scoring framework that integrates metrics for global accuracy, boundary layer fidelity, and physical consistency. Our findings reveal that newer foundation models significantly outperform neural operators, particularly in data-limited scenarios. In addition, binary mask representation enhances the performance of vision transformer models by up to 10%, while SDF representations improve neural operator performance by up to 7%. Despite these promises, all models struggle with out-of-distribution generalization, highlighting a critical challenge for future SciML applications. Our work paves the way for robust and scalable ML solutions for fluid dynamics across complex geometries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications Engineering
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44172-025-00513-3
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.32

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Benchmarking scientific machine-learning approaches for flow prediction around complex geometries

Aditya Balu, Baskar Ganapathysubramanian, Ethan Herron, Adarsh Krishnamurthy et al.
1 citations
Communications Engineering
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
1.32
article

Benchmarking scientific machine-learning approaches for flow prediction around complex geometries

Aditya Balu, Baskar Ganapathysubramanian, Ethan Herron, Adarsh Krishnamurthy, Chinmay Hegde, Soumik Sarkar, Ali Rabeh
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Rapid and accurate simulations of fluid dynamics around complicated geometric bodies are critical in a variety of engineering and scientific applications. While scientific machine learning (SciML) has shown considerable promise, most studies in this field are limited to simple geometries. This paper addresses this gap by benchmarking diverse SciML models, including neural operators and vision transformer-based foundation models, for fluid flow prediction over intricate geometries. We evaluate the impact of geometric representations-Signed Distance Fields (SDF) and binary masks-on model accuracy, scalability, and generalization using a high-fidelity dataset of steady-state flow over complex geometries. We introduce a unified scoring framework that integrates metrics for global accuracy, boundary layer fidelity, and physical consistency. Our findings reveal that newer foundation models significantly outperform neural operators, particularly in data-limited scenarios. In addition, binary mask representation enhances the performance of vision transformer models by up to 10%, while SDF representations improve neural operator performance by up to 7%. Despite these promises, all models struggle with out-of-distribution generalization, highlighting a critical challenge for future SciML applications. Our work paves the way for robust and scalable ML solutions for fluid dynamics across complex geometries.

Communications EngineeringVol. 4(1)
Iowa State University (US)
National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Division of Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
1.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.