Phishing reporting in organizations: What motivates employees to take action?

Purpose This study aims to investigate the factors influencing employees’ decisions to report suspicious phishing e-mails in organizations, addressing the gap in understanding what motivates users to report and which types of e-mails are most likely to be reported. Design/methodology/approach In this study, the authors sample and interview n = 49 employees from the pool of phishing reporters at a European university. Interviewees are selected based on the sophistication of the e-mails they report, considering both contextual and technical dimensions. The authors cluster reporters according to their (emerging) reporting behavior and conduct semistructured interviews until thematic saturation is reached. Through thematic analysis, the authors identify 21 main themes that drive reporting. Findings The results indicate that the primary drivers for reporting suspicious e-mails are the desire to protect and help the organization and coworkers. Additional factors include a sense of responsibility, awareness of potential consequences and feelings of insecurity. Participants are more likely to report phishing e-mails that appear well-impersonated and with a believable pretexts, signaling user prowess in estimating the potential impact of phishing attacks. Originality/value This research offers a novel perspective on the complex interplay between motivations to report with a discussion in the broader theoretical context, as well as on the practical implications of the findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information and Computer Security
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ics-02-2025-0037
Primary Topic
Spam and Phishing Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Phishing reporting in organizations: What motivates employees to take action?

Luca Allodi, Alexander Serebrenik, Pavlo Burda, Nicola Zannone
Information and Computer Security
Spam and Phishing Detection
article

Phishing reporting in organizations: What motivates employees to take action?

Luca Allodi, Alexander Serebrenik, Pavlo Burda, Nicola Zannone
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to investigate the factors influencing employees’ decisions to report suspicious phishing e-mails in organizations, addressing the gap in understanding what motivates users to report and which types of e-mails are most likely to be reported. Design/methodology/approach In this study, the authors sample and interview n = 49 employees from the pool of phishing reporters at a European university. Interviewees are selected based on the sophistication of the e-mails they report, considering both contextual and technical dimensions. The authors cluster reporters according to their (emerging) reporting behavior and conduct semistructured interviews until thematic saturation is reached. Through thematic analysis, the authors identify 21 main themes that drive reporting. Findings The results indicate that the primary drivers for reporting suspicious e-mails are the desire to protect and help the organization and coworkers. Additional factors include a sense of responsibility, awareness of potential consequences and feelings of insecurity. Participants are more likely to report phishing e-mails that appear well-impersonated and with a believable pretexts, signaling user prowess in estimating the potential impact of phishing attacks. Originality/value This research offers a novel perspective on the complex interplay between motivations to report with a discussion in the broader theoretical context, as well as on the practical implications of the findings.

Information and Computer Security
Netherlands Heart Institute (NL), Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Spam and Phishing Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.