Weathering Conflict: Impacts and Solutions for Protecting Hydrometeorological Infrastructure during Armed Conflict

Abstract There is limited research on how armed conflict negatively impacts hydrometeorological infrastructure and how this can be protected to enhance the functionality of early warning systems. This paper presents evidence about how and why conflict has directly and indirectly impacted hydrometeorological infrastructure and how this impacts the functioning of early warning systems (EWS) and potential solutions. We conducted semistructured interviews with 17 experts and performed a quantitative analysis of hydrometeorological and conflict data to investigate the connections between the lack of reporting from hydrometeorological stations and conflict incidents occurring within a 5-km radius of the stations. We found that conflict limits the collection, protection, and storage of hydrometeorological observations, which are crucial for producing weather forecasts and warnings. We found that hydrometeorological infrastructure has been directly destroyed and damaged by armed groups and indirectly hindered by insecurity, which limits access to conduct repairs and maintenance of infrastructure. We also found that when stations are installed in areas where the local population is unaware of their purpose, there is a lack of interest and incentive to maintain and protect them from vandalism. This research proposes a three-tier process for hydrometeorological infrastructure success: 1) Meteorological services should conduct conflict scenario analyses to define infrastructure needs, potential impacts of conflicts, and measures to mitigate such risks. 2) EWS donors and implementers should integrate a sociotechnical process to involve local communities and peace organizations during the lifetime of the infrastructure. 3) Governments and international financial institutions should coordinate planning for hydrometeorological infrastructure development with a common goal of enhancing global and national forecasting in conflict-affected regions. Significance Statement The purpose of this research is to reduce a knowledge gap about the impacts of armed conflict on hydrometeorological infrastructure and data. We found that hydrometeorological infrastructure has been directly destroyed and damaged by armed groups and indirectly hindered by insecurity, which limits access to conduct repairs and maintenance of infrastructure. The negative impacts of armed conflict on this infrastructure in places like Sudan, Colombia, and Cameroon reduce weather and climate services, jeopardizing early warning systems. We argue that there are avenues to reduce the impacts of conflict and enhance the protection of hydrometeorological infrastructure in conflict-affected countries, including supporting community ownership as part of a sociotechnical process in the hydrometeorological infrastructure process and leveraging International Humanitarian Law.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Weather Climate and Society
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1175/wcas-d-25-0073.1
Primary Topic
Transboundary Water Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Weathering Conflict: Impacts and Solutions for Protecting Hydrometeorological Infrastructure during Armed Conflict

Adele Young, Cornelia Scholz, Erin Coughlan de Perez, Catalina Jaime et al.
Weather Climate and Society
Transboundary Water Resource Management
article

Weathering Conflict: Impacts and Solutions for Protecting Hydrometeorological Infrastructure during Armed Conflict

Adele Young, Cornelia Scholz, Erin Coughlan de Perez, Catalina Jaime, Maarten van Aalst
article en

Abstract

Abstract There is limited research on how armed conflict negatively impacts hydrometeorological infrastructure and how this can be protected to enhance the functionality of early warning systems. This paper presents evidence about how and why conflict has directly and indirectly impacted hydrometeorological infrastructure and how this impacts the functioning of early warning systems (EWS) and potential solutions. We conducted semistructured interviews with 17 experts and performed a quantitative analysis of hydrometeorological and conflict data to investigate the connections between the lack of reporting from hydrometeorological stations and conflict incidents occurring within a 5-km radius of the stations. We found that conflict limits the collection, protection, and storage of hydrometeorological observations, which are crucial for producing weather forecasts and warnings. We found that hydrometeorological infrastructure has been directly destroyed and damaged by armed groups and indirectly hindered by insecurity, which limits access to conduct repairs and maintenance of infrastructure. We also found that when stations are installed in areas where the local population is unaware of their purpose, there is a lack of interest and incentive to maintain and protect them from vandalism. This research proposes a three-tier process for hydrometeorological infrastructure success: 1) Meteorological services should conduct conflict scenario analyses to define infrastructure needs, potential impacts of conflicts, and measures to mitigate such risks. 2) EWS donors and implementers should integrate a sociotechnical process to involve local communities and peace organizations during the lifetime of the infrastructure. 3) Governments and international financial institutions should coordinate planning for hydrometeorological infrastructure development with a common goal of enhancing global and national forecasting in conflict-affected regions. Significance Statement The purpose of this research is to reduce a knowledge gap about the impacts of armed conflict on hydrometeorological infrastructure and data. We found that hydrometeorological infrastructure has been directly destroyed and damaged by armed groups and indirectly hindered by insecurity, which limits access to conduct repairs and maintenance of infrastructure. The negative impacts of armed conflict on this infrastructure in places like Sudan, Colombia, and Cameroon reduce weather and climate services, jeopardizing early warning systems. We argue that there are avenues to reduce the impacts of conflict and enhance the protection of hydrometeorological infrastructure in conflict-affected countries, including supporting community ownership as part of a sociotechnical process in the hydrometeorological infrastructure process and leveraging International Humanitarian Law.

Weather Climate and SocietyVol. 17(4)
Tufts University (US), Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (NL), IHE Delft Institute for Water Education (NL), Climate Centre (NL), Columbia University (US), University of Twente (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Transboundary Water Resource Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.