Land, Women and Development: A Systematic Review of Causal Evidence

This article systematically reviews the causal literature on the impacts of women’s land rights on development in the Global South, asking how they affect different development outcomes, and what patterns emerge across types of rights, geographies, and methodological approaches. Following the PRISMA protocol, we screen over 800 records and retain 96 studies, covering 46 countries and 202 effects classified in 11 outcomes. Findings show consistently positive effects on empowerment, education, and health, though the latter are less studied. Evidence on investment, financial inclusion, and welfare is more ambiguous, while natural resource management and intra-household dynamics remain too underexplored for meaningful conclusions. Most research focuses on formal ownership, overlooking the broader ‘bundle’ of rights; regions outside Africa and South Asia are critically underrepresented. By mapping causal patterns and gaps, this review establishes a systematic evidence map and guides future evaluations addressing thematic and geographic blind spots.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bio-based and Applied Economics
Published
2025-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36253/bae-17846
Primary Topic
Land Rights and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Land, Women and Development: A Systematic Review of Causal Evidence

Sara Balestri, Valeria Paola Strusi
Bio-based and Applied Economics
Land Rights and Reforms
article

Land, Women and Development: A Systematic Review of Causal Evidence

Sara Balestri, Valeria Paola Strusi
article en

Abstract

This article systematically reviews the causal literature on the impacts of women’s land rights on development in the Global South, asking how they affect different development outcomes, and what patterns emerge across types of rights, geographies, and methodological approaches. Following the PRISMA protocol, we screen over 800 records and retain 96 studies, covering 46 countries and 202 effects classified in 11 outcomes. Findings show consistently positive effects on empowerment, education, and health, though the latter are less studied. Evidence on investment, financial inclusion, and welfare is more ambiguous, while natural resource management and intra-household dynamics remain too underexplored for meaningful conclusions. Most research focuses on formal ownership, overlooking the broader ‘bundle’ of rights; regions outside Africa and South Asia are critically underrepresented. By mapping causal patterns and gaps, this review establishes a systematic evidence map and guides future evaluations addressing thematic and geographic blind spots.

Bio-based and Applied Economics
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT), University of Perugia (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Land Rights and Reforms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.