Comparison of glass‐based and whole‐slide image‐based grade assignment for clear‐cell and papillary renal cell carcinoma: a multi‐cohort, international reproducibility study

WSI-based grading approach for RCC results in divergent grading outcomes, with a trend to over-grading. The interobserver and especially intraobserver agreement present in low to moderate areas for both modalities warrants more standardization and exploring the potential of artificial intelligence for grading objectivization. Institute-specific staining differences might be a confounder for less reproducible RCC grading. We open-source all digital datasets and grades for education and research purposes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Histopathology
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/his.70030
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of glass‐based and whole‐slide image‐based grade assignment for clear‐cell and papillary renal cell carcinoma: a multi‐cohort, international reproducibility study

Maria Tretiakova, Reinhard Büttner, Alexander Quaas, Tarek A. Bismar et al.
1 citations
Histopathology
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
1.52
article

Comparison of glass‐based and whole‐slide image‐based grade assignment for clear‐cell and papillary renal cell carcinoma: a multi‐cohort, international reproducibility study

Maria Tretiakova, Reinhard Büttner, Alexander Quaas, Tarek A. Bismar, Marie‐Lisa Eich, Henning Reis, Richard Weiten, Joema Felipe Lima, Wolfgang Hulla, Pia Paffenholz, Yuri Tolkach, George J. Netto, Hoa Pham, Nadine Therese Gaisa, Ibrahim Fahoum, Axel Heidenreich, Alexey Pryalukhin, Julian Westerdorf, Nina A Lasnitschka
article en
1 citations

Abstract

WSI-based grading approach for RCC results in divergent grading outcomes, with a trend to over-grading. The interobserver and especially intraobserver agreement present in low to moderate areas for both modalities warrants more standardization and exploring the potential of artificial intelligence for grading objectivization. Institute-specific staining differences might be a confounder for less reproducible RCC grading. We open-source all digital datasets and grades for education and research purposes.

HistopathologyVol. 88(3)
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), University of Calgary (CA), University of Washington (US), Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center (IL), Fachhochschule Wiener Neustadt (AT), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), University Hospital Frankfurt (DE), Bạch Mai Hospital (VN), University Hospital Cologne (DE), University Hospital Ulm (DE), Freie Universität Berlin (DE), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
1.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.