Next Generation Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment (QMRA): Bigger, Better, Faster

New pathogens and contaminants that threaten public health and the environment continually emerge. While major advancements have been made in high-throughput analysis methodologies, the current “one-contaminant-at-a-time” approach to quantifying risk that continues to prevail in policy analysis is not sufficient to keep pace. Assessing coexposures and their associated synergisms, antagonisms, or other effects with respect to risk is needed to move beyond this approach. Leveraging concepts from computational toxicology and chemical risk assessment, we propose a roadmap for the integration and advancement of quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) to be bigger, better, and faster. The integrated risk assessment paradigm focuses on (1) integrating microbial omics tools into QMRA including broadening hazard considerations to combinations of pathogens and expressed genes, (2) combining chemical, nonchemical, and pathogen stressors in a common framework for informing cost and sustainability trade-offs in risk management decisions, and (3) advancing actionable risk assessment tools. This approach will promote transdisciplinary, practical risk management solutions by enabling decision-makers to rapidly predict and respond to health risks from complex modern environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Science & Technology Letters
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.5c00782
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Fecal contamination and water quality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Next Generation Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment (QMRA): Bigger, Better, Faster

Muhammad Atif Nisar, Kerry A. Hamilton, Nicholas J. Ashbolt, Benjamin C. Davis et al.
3 citations
Environmental Science & Technology Letters
Fecal contamination and water quality
2.45
article

Next Generation Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment (QMRA): Bigger, Better, Faster

Muhammad Atif Nisar, Kerry A. Hamilton, Nicholas J. Ashbolt, Benjamin C. Davis, Hunter Quon, Michael A. Jahne, Jay L. Garland, Clinton F. Williams, Satoshi Ishii, Qian Zhang, Joseph N. S. Eisenberg
article en
3 citations

Abstract

New pathogens and contaminants that threaten public health and the environment continually emerge. While major advancements have been made in high-throughput analysis methodologies, the current “one-contaminant-at-a-time” approach to quantifying risk that continues to prevail in policy analysis is not sufficient to keep pace. Assessing coexposures and their associated synergisms, antagonisms, or other effects with respect to risk is needed to move beyond this approach. Leveraging concepts from computational toxicology and chemical risk assessment, we propose a roadmap for the integration and advancement of quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) to be bigger, better, and faster. The integrated risk assessment paradigm focuses on (1) integrating microbial omics tools into QMRA including broadening hazard considerations to combinations of pathogens and expressed genes, (2) combining chemical, nonchemical, and pathogen stressors in a common framework for informing cost and sustainability trade-offs in risk management decisions, and (3) advancing actionable risk assessment tools. This approach will promote transdisciplinary, practical risk management solutions by enabling decision-makers to rapidly predict and respond to health risks from complex modern environments.

Environmental Science & Technology LettersVol. 12(11)
Environmental Protection Agency (US), University of Minnesota (US), Biotechnology Institute (US), Queensland University of Technology (AU), Environmental Protection Agency (GH), Xiamen University (CN), University of Michigan (US), U.S. Arid Land Agricultural Research Center (US), Arizona State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Fecal contamination and water quality
2.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.