Assessing trauma-related symptomatology in the Netherlands: the Dutch Global Psychotrauma Screen (GPS)

<b>Background:</b> Most adults have experienced at least one Potentially Traumatic Event (PTE) in their life. Yet, many individuals who develop adverse outcomes such as posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are not identified and therefore not treated. Hence, there is a need for better screening tools for trauma-related disorders after exposure to PTEs.<b>Objective:</b> The aim of the present study was to assess validity and reliability of the Dutch version of the Global Psychotrauma Screen (GPS), an easy-to-administer transdiagnostic screener for trauma-related disorders, using a community-based sample of the Dutch adult (16+) population.<b>Method:</b> An online survey was conducted among 1377 Dutch adults. Clinical semi-structured interviews were used as gold-standard comparative measures of PTSD (CAPS-5), depression, and anxiety (MINI) in a subset of participants (<i>n</i> = 188). The psychometric characteristics of the Dutch GPS were assessed. We determined the optimal cutoffs for screening for (complex) PTSD, anxiety and depression. We compared the Dutch GPS screening performance with other established screeners (PCL-5, GAD-7, and PHQ-9). We performed regression analyses and analyses of covariance to identify risk-factors and symptoms severity groups regarding impaired social and work functioning.<b>Results:</b> The Dutch GPS showed good performance regarding internal consistency, convergent, and divergent validity, and excellent screening performance for (complex) PTSD, anxiety, and depression comparable to screeners for these specific disorders. Younger age, female sex, being unemployed, having a history of mental illness, having experienced childhood trauma, or other stressful events, and low social support were risk factors for higher GPS total symptom score.<b>Conclusions:</b> The Dutch GPS is a valid and reliable instrument for detection of PTSD and other trauma-related disorders. It is therefore a valuable easily applicable tool that can support diagnostic processes in both research and clinical practice across a wide variety of settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Psychotraumatology
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2572850
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.31

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing trauma-related symptomatology in the Netherlands: the Dutch Global Psychotrauma Screen (GPS)

Chris M. Hoeboer, Birit F. P. Broekman, Miranda Olff, F. Alejandro Nava
1 citations
European Journal of Psychotraumatology
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
2.31
article

Assessing trauma-related symptomatology in the Netherlands: the Dutch Global Psychotrauma Screen (GPS)

Chris M. Hoeboer, Birit F. P. Broekman, Miranda Olff, F. Alejandro Nava
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Most adults have experienced at least one Potentially Traumatic Event (PTE) in their life. Yet, many individuals who develop adverse outcomes such as posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are not identified and therefore not treated. Hence, there is a need for better screening tools for trauma-related disorders after exposure to PTEs.<b>Objective:</b> The aim of the present study was to assess validity and reliability of the Dutch version of the Global Psychotrauma Screen (GPS), an easy-to-administer transdiagnostic screener for trauma-related disorders, using a community-based sample of the Dutch adult (16+) population.<b>Method:</b> An online survey was conducted among 1377 Dutch adults. Clinical semi-structured interviews were used as gold-standard comparative measures of PTSD (CAPS-5), depression, and anxiety (MINI) in a subset of participants (<i>n</i> = 188). The psychometric characteristics of the Dutch GPS were assessed. We determined the optimal cutoffs for screening for (complex) PTSD, anxiety and depression. We compared the Dutch GPS screening performance with other established screeners (PCL-5, GAD-7, and PHQ-9). We performed regression analyses and analyses of covariance to identify risk-factors and symptoms severity groups regarding impaired social and work functioning.<b>Results:</b> The Dutch GPS showed good performance regarding internal consistency, convergent, and divergent validity, and excellent screening performance for (complex) PTSD, anxiety, and depression comparable to screeners for these specific disorders. Younger age, female sex, being unemployed, having a history of mental illness, having experienced childhood trauma, or other stressful events, and low social support were risk factors for higher GPS total symptom score.<b>Conclusions:</b> The Dutch GPS is a valid and reliable instrument for detection of PTSD and other trauma-related disorders. It is therefore a valuable easily applicable tool that can support diagnostic processes in both research and clinical practice across a wide variety of settings.

European Journal of PsychotraumatologyVol. 16(1)
Arq Psychotrauma Expert Group (NL), GGD Amsterdam (NL), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL), Hologic (Germany) (DE)
ZonMw
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
2.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.