An Interventional Study to Evaluate the Effect of Communication Skill Training and Its Perception Among Second-Year Undergraduate Medical Students

Background Communication is a core competency in medical education, directly influencing patient trust, diagnosis, and adherence. Structured training interventions are recommended, but evidence from undergraduate cohorts in India remains limited. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of structured communication skill training and explore students' perceptions regarding its importance in medical education. Materials and Methods A prospective educational interventional study was conducted among second-year undergraduate students at a tertiary care teaching hospital to evaluate the impact of structured communication skill training. Communication performance was assessed using the Kalamazoo Essential Elements Communication Checklist (KEECC) before and after training, in which all seven components were intact but sub-questions were reduced for objectivity. A post hoc expert review and content validity index confirmed tool validity. Students' perceptions toward communication skills were collected through an adapted questionnaire and analyzed for reliability and construct validity. The intervention consisted of scripted role plays demonstrating poor and effective communication. Data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank and paired t-tests, with reliability (Cronbach's alpha), factor analysis, and effect sizes (Cohen's d and w) calculated. Results Of 92 eligible students, 79 (85.9%) completed the study. The mean KEECC score improved significantly from 3.04 to 7.36 out of 10 post-training (Z=-7.728, p<0.0001). All seven communication domains showed significant gains (p<0.001 each), with large effect sizes for building relationships (d=1.54), gathering information (d=1.36), reaching agreement (d=1.18), and providing closure (d=1.04). Perception analysis revealed a strong student endorsement: 75 (93.8%) agreed that communication skills build patient confidence, and 80 (100%) found the training effective. Factor analysis confirmed a unidimensional construct reflecting the perceived importance of communication skills. Conclusion Structured communication skill training significantly enhanced undergraduate medical students' communication performance at our institute, with robust improvements across all domains. Moreover, students strongly recognized the importance and effectiveness of communication skill training.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.95819
Primary Topic
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Interventional Study to Evaluate the Effect of Communication Skill Training and Its Perception Among Second-Year Undergraduate Medical Students

Tejas Acharya, Gaurav Ganeshbhai Kakasaniya, Uday Shankar Singh, Sunita Chhaiya et al.
Cureus
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
article

An Interventional Study to Evaluate the Effect of Communication Skill Training and Its Perception Among Second-Year Undergraduate Medical Students

Tejas Acharya, Gaurav Ganeshbhai Kakasaniya, Uday Shankar Singh, Sunita Chhaiya, Yagnik A Vaghasia, Riya J Master
article en

Abstract

Background Communication is a core competency in medical education, directly influencing patient trust, diagnosis, and adherence. Structured training interventions are recommended, but evidence from undergraduate cohorts in India remains limited. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of structured communication skill training and explore students' perceptions regarding its importance in medical education. Materials and Methods A prospective educational interventional study was conducted among second-year undergraduate students at a tertiary care teaching hospital to evaluate the impact of structured communication skill training. Communication performance was assessed using the Kalamazoo Essential Elements Communication Checklist (KEECC) before and after training, in which all seven components were intact but sub-questions were reduced for objectivity. A post hoc expert review and content validity index confirmed tool validity. Students' perceptions toward communication skills were collected through an adapted questionnaire and analyzed for reliability and construct validity. The intervention consisted of scripted role plays demonstrating poor and effective communication. Data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank and paired t-tests, with reliability (Cronbach's alpha), factor analysis, and effect sizes (Cohen's d and w) calculated. Results Of 92 eligible students, 79 (85.9%) completed the study. The mean KEECC score improved significantly from 3.04 to 7.36 out of 10 post-training (Z=-7.728, p<0.0001). All seven communication domains showed significant gains (p<0.001 each), with large effect sizes for building relationships (d=1.54), gathering information (d=1.36), reaching agreement (d=1.18), and providing closure (d=1.04). Perception analysis revealed a strong student endorsement: 75 (93.8%) agreed that communication skills build patient confidence, and 80 (100%) found the training effective. Factor analysis confirmed a unidimensional construct reflecting the perceived importance of communication skills. Conclusion Structured communication skill training significantly enhanced undergraduate medical students' communication performance at our institute, with robust improvements across all domains. Moreover, students strongly recognized the importance and effectiveness of communication skill training.

CureusVol. 17(10)
CU Shah Medical College and Hospital (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.