Evaluating Weather and Chemical Transport Models at High Latitudes using MAGIC2021 Airborne Measurements

Abstract. High latitude wetland emissions of methane (CH4) remain a significant source of uncertainty in global methane budgets. At these latitudes, flux estimation approaches, such as atmospheric inversions, are challenged by complex meteorological conditions, limited observational coverage, and uncertainties in atmospheric transport modelling. This study evaluates the performance of various atmospheric transport models and reanalysis datasets using meteorological and CH4 in-situ measurements collected during the MAGIC2021 campaign near Kiruna, Sweden. Over six days of measurements in August 2021, the ERA5 reanalysis, produced by the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) and providing global atmospheric data, showed better agreement with observations compared to the meso-scale Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model, though WRF provided valuable insights into local atmospheric dynamics. Among global simulations of CH4 mixing ratios, inversion-optimised models which adjust emissions to match observations, achieved the best performance overall particularly when constrained by surface measurements. Regional simulations from WRF coupled with chemistry (WRF-Chem) revealed biases in CH4 mixing ratios in the boundary layer, suggesting an overestimation of emissions by wetland models. All chemistry-transport models exhibited a positive bias in the stratosphere. Simulations with higher vertical resolution demonstrated an improved representation of vertical CH4 profiles in the upper layers of the atmosphere. Despite the limited spatio-temporal coverage of the observations, we were able to identify the best performing transport models and to evaluate fluxes from different biogeochemical model parameterisations using the MAGIC2021 high-resolution dataset, demonstrating the utility of in-situ vertical profile datasets for transport and flux model evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Atmospheric measurement techniques
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-5955-2025
Primary Topic
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Weather and Chemical Transport Models at High Latitudes using MAGIC2021 Airborne Measurements

Michel Ramonet, Axel Guedj, Marielle Saunois, Cyril Crévoisier et al.
Atmospheric measurement techniques
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
article

Evaluating Weather and Chemical Transport Models at High Latitudes using MAGIC2021 Airborne Measurements

Michel Ramonet, Axel Guedj, Marielle Saunois, Cyril Crévoisier, Xin Lin, Charbel Abdallah, Thomas Lauvaux, Klaus-Dirk Gottschaldt, Félix Langot, Alina Fiehn, Julien Moyé, Jérôme Pernin, Thomas Ponthieu, Anke Roiger
article en

Abstract

Abstract. High latitude wetland emissions of methane (CH4) remain a significant source of uncertainty in global methane budgets. At these latitudes, flux estimation approaches, such as atmospheric inversions, are challenged by complex meteorological conditions, limited observational coverage, and uncertainties in atmospheric transport modelling. This study evaluates the performance of various atmospheric transport models and reanalysis datasets using meteorological and CH4 in-situ measurements collected during the MAGIC2021 campaign near Kiruna, Sweden. Over six days of measurements in August 2021, the ERA5 reanalysis, produced by the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) and providing global atmospheric data, showed better agreement with observations compared to the meso-scale Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model, though WRF provided valuable insights into local atmospheric dynamics. Among global simulations of CH4 mixing ratios, inversion-optimised models which adjust emissions to match observations, achieved the best performance overall particularly when constrained by surface measurements. Regional simulations from WRF coupled with chemistry (WRF-Chem) revealed biases in CH4 mixing ratios in the boundary layer, suggesting an overestimation of emissions by wetland models. All chemistry-transport models exhibited a positive bias in the stratosphere. Simulations with higher vertical resolution demonstrated an improved representation of vertical CH4 profiles in the upper layers of the atmosphere. Despite the limited spatio-temporal coverage of the observations, we were able to identify the best performing transport models and to evaluate fluxes from different biogeochemical model parameterisations using the MAGIC2021 high-resolution dataset, demonstrating the utility of in-situ vertical profile datasets for transport and flux model evaluation.

Atmospheric measurement techniquesVol. 18(21)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), École Polytechnique (FR), Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR), Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE), Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique (FR), Laboratoire de Recherche des Monuments Historiques (FR), Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement (FR), CEA Paris-Saclay (FR), Groupe de Spectrométrie Moléculaire et Atmosphérique (FR), Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.