Examining Physiological Response and Facial Expression as Indicators of Trust in a Robot Partner

Developments in the assistive capabilities of robots have allowed them to be more prevalent across domains from manufacturing to healthcare to education. To achieve more efficient and fluent collaborations between robots and humans, it has become necessary to explore how humans trust robot partners during collaborations. Current measurements of human trust in a robot partner typically rely on reflective, subjective survey measures, which are difficult to incorporate and update in the robot’s decision-making models for real-time deployment. To address this challenge, we aim to identify potential objective measures of trust, which can be incorporated into the robot’s decision-making process. We examine physiological data (Electrodermal Activity (EDA), Skin Temperature (TEMP), and Blood Volume Pulse (BVP)) and facial expression in an in-person ( \(n=30\) ) human–robot collaboration study and report the effect of trust on these objective measures. The results indicate that the participants who distrusted the robot partner experienced higher EDA, higher TEMP, and lower BVP variations than participants who trusted the robot. For facial expression, participants who distrusted the robot had more intense facial expressions than participants who trusted the robot. Ultimately, these findings can be used to further research on developing a real-time model of human trust in robots.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3773895
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining Physiological Response and Facial Expression as Indicators of Trust in a Robot Partner

Haley N. Green, Tariq Iqbal
1 citations
ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
2.44
article

Examining Physiological Response and Facial Expression as Indicators of Trust in a Robot Partner

Haley N. Green, Tariq Iqbal
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Developments in the assistive capabilities of robots have allowed them to be more prevalent across domains from manufacturing to healthcare to education. To achieve more efficient and fluent collaborations between robots and humans, it has become necessary to explore how humans trust robot partners during collaborations. Current measurements of human trust in a robot partner typically rely on reflective, subjective survey measures, which are difficult to incorporate and update in the robot’s decision-making models for real-time deployment. To address this challenge, we aim to identify potential objective measures of trust, which can be incorporated into the robot’s decision-making process. We examine physiological data (Electrodermal Activity (EDA), Skin Temperature (TEMP), and Blood Volume Pulse (BVP)) and facial expression in an in-person ( \(n=30\) ) human–robot collaboration study and report the effect of trust on these objective measures. The results indicate that the participants who distrusted the robot partner experienced higher EDA, higher TEMP, and lower BVP variations than participants who trusted the robot. For facial expression, participants who distrusted the robot had more intense facial expressions than participants who trusted the robot. Ultimately, these findings can be used to further research on developing a real-time model of human trust in robots.

ACM Transactions on Human-Robot InteractionVol. 15(2)
University of Virginia (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
2.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.