Enhancing Trust Examinations with Neural Measures during Human–Robot Collaboration under Cognitive Fatigue

Trust in human–robot collaboration (HRC) is influenced by situational factors, such as human states of fatigue and robot performance (e.g., reliability). In industrial settings, operators are often fatigued which increases attentional demands. This sustained mental demand may potentially alter the trusting behaviors of the operator. Whether this happens, and why, are currently unexplored. While most studies have relied on self-reports, recent advancements in neuroergonomics have enabled the assessment of neural signatures of trust. We hypothesize that shedding light on the neural mechanisms during HRC, under varying trust states, may provide additional insights (beyond trust perceptions) into the subconscious cognitive or affective states associated with trust under cognitive fatigue. To test this hypothesis, we conducted an HRC experiment on 16 sex-balanced participants in which trust was manipulated via robot reliability at two sessions (fatigue session and no-fatigue session). We monitored brain activity, heart rate variability (HRV), performances, and subjective experiences to investigate the effect of cognitive fatigue and robot reliability on trust metrics in HRC. A significant main effect of cognitive fatigue and reliability was observed on brain activations, functional and effective connectivity, HRV, subjective response, and performance. While most measures were sensitive to changes in cognitive fatigue and reliability, only neural responses revealed interactions between reliability, cognitive fatigue, and sex. Anterior prefrontal cortex (APFC)–left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (LDLPFC) connection strength decreased with unreliable robot behavior in non-fatigued states but unexpectedly increased when fatigue was present. This suggests a neural strategy shift involving greater top-down influence from executive to motivational regions to exert more mental effort in challenging HRC conditions. Insights from this investigation can advance objective trust measures under cognitive fatigue states and help design better collaborations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3773905
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing Trust Examinations with Neural Measures during Human–Robot Collaboration under Cognitive Fatigue

Sarah K. Hopko, Prabhakar R. Pagilla, Ranjana K. Mehta, Aakash Yadav
ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Enhancing Trust Examinations with Neural Measures during Human–Robot Collaboration under Cognitive Fatigue

Sarah K. Hopko, Prabhakar R. Pagilla, Ranjana K. Mehta, Aakash Yadav
article en

Abstract

Trust in human–robot collaboration (HRC) is influenced by situational factors, such as human states of fatigue and robot performance (e.g., reliability). In industrial settings, operators are often fatigued which increases attentional demands. This sustained mental demand may potentially alter the trusting behaviors of the operator. Whether this happens, and why, are currently unexplored. While most studies have relied on self-reports, recent advancements in neuroergonomics have enabled the assessment of neural signatures of trust. We hypothesize that shedding light on the neural mechanisms during HRC, under varying trust states, may provide additional insights (beyond trust perceptions) into the subconscious cognitive or affective states associated with trust under cognitive fatigue. To test this hypothesis, we conducted an HRC experiment on 16 sex-balanced participants in which trust was manipulated via robot reliability at two sessions (fatigue session and no-fatigue session). We monitored brain activity, heart rate variability (HRV), performances, and subjective experiences to investigate the effect of cognitive fatigue and robot reliability on trust metrics in HRC. A significant main effect of cognitive fatigue and reliability was observed on brain activations, functional and effective connectivity, HRV, subjective response, and performance. While most measures were sensitive to changes in cognitive fatigue and reliability, only neural responses revealed interactions between reliability, cognitive fatigue, and sex. Anterior prefrontal cortex (APFC)–left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (LDLPFC) connection strength decreased with unreliable robot behavior in non-fatigued states but unexpectedly increased when fatigue was present. This suggests a neural strategy shift involving greater top-down influence from executive to motivational regions to exert more mental effort in challenging HRC conditions. Insights from this investigation can advance objective trust measures under cognitive fatigue states and help design better collaborations.

ACM Transactions on Human-Robot InteractionVol. 15(2)
University of Wisconsin System (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Texas A&M University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.