Social Media Participation and Scholarly Success in Law

Using a novel dataset on Twitter activity as well as a novel corpus of law journal publications, this paper examines the impact of social media activity on the scholarly success of U.S. law professors. We find that joining Twitter increases citation counts by an average of 22% per year and improves article placements by up to 10 ranks for law professors, relative to a synthetic control group. These positive returns apply across nearly all classes of scholars and are magnified for those who post frequently about their own work. The identified citation boost would be even larger than 22% if it were not partially offset by a decline in citations to articles published pre-Twitter. Overall, our results suggest that social media participation yields concrete benefits in the legal academy—indeed, benefits outstripping those that prior studies have identified in other disciplines—along with a number of potential downsides.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of law & empirical analysis.
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/2755323x251392307
Primary Topic
Authorship Attribution and Profiling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social Media Participation and Scholarly Success in Law

David E. Pozen, Julian Nyarko
Journal of law & empirical analysis.
Authorship Attribution and Profiling
article

Social Media Participation and Scholarly Success in Law

David E. Pozen, Julian Nyarko
article en

Abstract

Using a novel dataset on Twitter activity as well as a novel corpus of law journal publications, this paper examines the impact of social media activity on the scholarly success of U.S. law professors. We find that joining Twitter increases citation counts by an average of 22% per year and improves article placements by up to 10 ranks for law professors, relative to a synthetic control group. These positive returns apply across nearly all classes of scholars and are magnified for those who post frequently about their own work. The identified citation boost would be even larger than 22% if it were not partially offset by a decline in citations to articles published pre-Twitter. Overall, our results suggest that social media participation yields concrete benefits in the legal academy—indeed, benefits outstripping those that prior studies have identified in other disciplines—along with a number of potential downsides.

Journal of law & empirical analysis.Vol. 2(2)
Stanford Medicine (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Authorship Attribution and Profiling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Social Media Participation and Scholarly Success in Law — David E. Pozen, Julian Nyarko · Journal of law & empirical analysis. (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS