Machine learning methods on BioVid heat pain database for pain intensity estimation

Pain assessment is a critical aspect of medical practice, directly influencing patient treatment and quality of life. Traditional pain evaluation methods, such as the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and Verbal Rating Scale (VRS), are subjective and often unreliable, especially for non-verbal, unconscious, or cognitively impaired patients. This study introduces an objective pain measurement model using advanced machine learning techniques, specifically, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), and Vision Transformers (ViTs), to analyze facial expressions. We compared the performance of CNNs, VGG16, Convolutional Vision Transformer (CvT), and MobileViT, in classifying pain intensity based on facial images captured during peak pain and no-pain moments. The models were trained and evaluated on the BioVid Heat Pain Database, which comprises facial recordings of 87 participants experiencing varying pain intensities. The comparative analysis of the CNN, VGG16, CvT, and MobileViT50 models reveal distinct differences in their performance metrics. Among the four models, the CNN model achieved the highest average accuracy at 0.71, demonstrating better performance in correctly classifying both pain and no pain images. The CvT model followed closely with an average accuracy of 0.69, indicating that it also performed well, although slightly less effectively than CNN. MobileViT50, with an accuracy of 0.60, and VGG16, with 0.56, performed significantly lower, suggesting that these models struggled more with accurately classifying the data. These results highlight the potential of automated pain assessment technologies to provide consistent and objective evaluations, which can be particularly beneficial in clinical environments for non-communicative patients. Future research will explore the integration of multimodal data to further enhance the robustness of pain detection systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-21987-3
Primary Topic
Emotion and Mood Recognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine learning methods on BioVid heat pain database for pain intensity estimation

Melpo Pittara, Andreas S. Panayides, Maria Matsangidou, Nicolai Petkov et al.
Scientific Reports
Emotion and Mood Recognition
article

Machine learning methods on BioVid heat pain database for pain intensity estimation

Melpo Pittara, Andreas S. Panayides, Maria Matsangidou, Nicolai Petkov, Constantinos S. Pattichis, Andreas Anastasiou, K Andreou
article en

Abstract

Pain assessment is a critical aspect of medical practice, directly influencing patient treatment and quality of life. Traditional pain evaluation methods, such as the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and Verbal Rating Scale (VRS), are subjective and often unreliable, especially for non-verbal, unconscious, or cognitively impaired patients. This study introduces an objective pain measurement model using advanced machine learning techniques, specifically, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), and Vision Transformers (ViTs), to analyze facial expressions. We compared the performance of CNNs, VGG16, Convolutional Vision Transformer (CvT), and MobileViT, in classifying pain intensity based on facial images captured during peak pain and no-pain moments. The models were trained and evaluated on the BioVid Heat Pain Database, which comprises facial recordings of 87 participants experiencing varying pain intensities. The comparative analysis of the CNN, VGG16, CvT, and MobileViT50 models reveal distinct differences in their performance metrics. Among the four models, the CNN model achieved the highest average accuracy at 0.71, demonstrating better performance in correctly classifying both pain and no pain images. The CvT model followed closely with an average accuracy of 0.69, indicating that it also performed well, although slightly less effectively than CNN. MobileViT50, with an accuracy of 0.60, and VGG16, with 0.56, performed significantly lower, suggesting that these models struggled more with accurately classifying the data. These results highlight the potential of automated pain assessment technologies to provide consistent and objective evaluations, which can be particularly beneficial in clinical environments for non-communicative patients. Future research will explore the integration of multimodal data to further enhance the robustness of pain detection systems.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
University of Groningen (NL), University of Cyprus (CY)
Research and Innovation Foundation, European Regional Development Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Emotion and Mood Recognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.