Concealed Contradictions: Sustainable Development Goals and Indigenous Land Dispossession in Cambodia

This paper examines how the dual forces of Economic Land Concessions and nature conservation projects in Cambodia converge to dispossess the Indigenous Bunong communities of their forest commons—land held as common property and managed collectively by local institutions, with access determined by matrilineal descent. Drawing on ethnographic research, it argues that the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), rather than transforming entrenched exclusionary practices, function as an institutional epiphenomenon: a discursive layer that enables the Cambodian state to reframe ongoing dispossession in the language of global sustainability while leaving underlying power structures intact. The analysis exposes how state-led land titling processes and overlapping land allocations perpetuate exclusion, masking the gap between the SDGs’ stated aims and the lived realities of the Bunong. The findings call for a critical reassessment of the SDG framework, emphasizing the need to address the political-economic context and the agency of states in selectively mobilizing global agendas to maintain established patterns of Indigenous exclusion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of the Commons
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.1514
Primary Topic
Cambodian History and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Concealed Contradictions: Sustainable Development Goals and Indigenous Land Dispossession in Cambodia

Esther Leemann
International Journal of the Commons
Cambodian History and Society
article

Concealed Contradictions: Sustainable Development Goals and Indigenous Land Dispossession in Cambodia

Esther Leemann
article en

Abstract

This paper examines how the dual forces of Economic Land Concessions and nature conservation projects in Cambodia converge to dispossess the Indigenous Bunong communities of their forest commons—land held as common property and managed collectively by local institutions, with access determined by matrilineal descent. Drawing on ethnographic research, it argues that the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), rather than transforming entrenched exclusionary practices, function as an institutional epiphenomenon: a discursive layer that enables the Cambodian state to reframe ongoing dispossession in the language of global sustainability while leaving underlying power structures intact. The analysis exposes how state-led land titling processes and overlapping land allocations perpetuate exclusion, masking the gap between the SDGs’ stated aims and the lived realities of the Bunong. The findings call for a critical reassessment of the SDG framework, emphasizing the need to address the political-economic context and the agency of states in selectively mobilizing global agendas to maintain established patterns of Indigenous exclusion.

International Journal of the CommonsVol. 19(1)
University of Zurich (CH)
National Science Foundation, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Cambodian History and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.