One gospel in many contextual forms: A cognitive linguistic model for contextualising atonement language

This article considers the relationship between the normativity of the gospel and its many contextual forms from a cognitive linguistic perspective. Current evangelical approaches to this issue uphold the normativity and varied expressions of the gospel but are problematic in how they relate them. This article argues that cognitive linguistics, particularly its account of encyclopaedic meaning, embodied cognition, and conceptual metaphor theory, can shape a better model. The value of Scripture’s atonement metaphors is in their positive mappings, namely what the source practice/frame says about Jesus, and so any proposed contextual atonement metaphor must be able to motivate and constrain similar meanings. This acknowledges both the irreplaceable value of Scripture’s atonement language, and their function in distinguishing between appropriate contextualisation and dangerous syncretism. Throughout, the article dialogues with the case study of Christ as the Pig of God in pig-sacrificing Melanesian societies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Missiology An International Review
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00918296251385545
Primary Topic
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

One gospel in many contextual forms: A cognitive linguistic model for contextualising atonement language

Philip J. Sampson
Missiology An International Review
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
article

One gospel in many contextual forms: A cognitive linguistic model for contextualising atonement language

Philip J. Sampson
article en

Abstract

This article considers the relationship between the normativity of the gospel and its many contextual forms from a cognitive linguistic perspective. Current evangelical approaches to this issue uphold the normativity and varied expressions of the gospel but are problematic in how they relate them. This article argues that cognitive linguistics, particularly its account of encyclopaedic meaning, embodied cognition, and conceptual metaphor theory, can shape a better model. The value of Scripture’s atonement metaphors is in their positive mappings, namely what the source practice/frame says about Jesus, and so any proposed contextual atonement metaphor must be able to motivate and constrain similar meanings. This acknowledges both the irreplaceable value of Scripture’s atonement language, and their function in distinguishing between appropriate contextualisation and dangerous syncretism. Throughout, the article dialogues with the case study of Christ as the Pig of God in pig-sacrificing Melanesian societies.

Missiology An International Review
University of Otago (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

One gospel in many contextual forms: A cognitive linguistic model for contextualising atonement language — Philip J. Sampson · Missiology An International Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS