Perceptions and Impact of a Worldwide Virtual Medical Learning Strategy in Endoscopic Spine Surgery: A 1-Year Prospective Comparative Study

Objective: Endoscopic spine surgery (ESS) is a relatively new approach for managing several spine pathologies. However, some challenges remain regarding its training and implementation. Virtual medical education (VME) emerged as a strategy during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, but the use of VME as a learning strategy for ESS has been inadequately studied. The purpose of this study was to report participants' perceptions of the clinical impact1 year after implementation of an ESS-VME strategy during the pandemic, 1 year after implementation.Methods: A cross-sectional international paired-survey descriptive study was conducted to evaluate the impact and perceptions of a VME strategy for ESS. Participants completed 3 surveys before, immediately after, and 1 year following the course to assess their perceptions of the training, its contribution to their clinical practice, and the feasibility of implementing ESS in a timely manner.Results: In total, 996 specialists from 27 countries were enrolled. Approximately 38% (n=371) of the original respondents completed the course satisfactorily, met the certification requirements, and answered the second survey, reporting 97.8% satisfaction with a score greater than 8 points out of 10. Furthermore, 93.1% stated that the course significantly contributed to their clinical practice. At 1.11± 0.08 years after completing the course, 88 participants (24% of participants who completed the course) answered the final survey. The percentage of participants who had performed some ESS increased from 39.2% to 60.8% (p<0.05). More than 60% of the participants received some additional training.Conclusions: Medical education underwent significant changes following the COVID-19 pandemic. Developing curricular programs with VME tools can reduce training costs and time, while achieving high satisfaction and positive, measurable impacts. The final success of the training is the implementation of the techniques with a low complication rate.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21182/jmisst.2025.02173
Primary Topic
Surgical Simulation and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perceptions and Impact of a Worldwide Virtual Medical Learning Strategy in Endoscopic Spine Surgery: A 1-Year Prospective Comparative Study

Nicolás Prada Ramírez, Gabriel Oswaldo Alonso Cuéllar, Jorge Felipe Ramírez León, Carolina Ramírez Martínez et al.
Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique
Surgical Simulation and Training
article

Perceptions and Impact of a Worldwide Virtual Medical Learning Strategy in Endoscopic Spine Surgery: A 1-Year Prospective Comparative Study

Nicolás Prada Ramírez, Gabriel Oswaldo Alonso Cuéllar, Jorge Felipe Ramírez León, Carolina Ramírez Martínez, José Gabriel Rugeles Ortíz
article en

Abstract

Objective: Endoscopic spine surgery (ESS) is a relatively new approach for managing several spine pathologies. However, some challenges remain regarding its training and implementation. Virtual medical education (VME) emerged as a strategy during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, but the use of VME as a learning strategy for ESS has been inadequately studied. The purpose of this study was to report participants' perceptions of the clinical impact1 year after implementation of an ESS-VME strategy during the pandemic, 1 year after implementation.Methods: A cross-sectional international paired-survey descriptive study was conducted to evaluate the impact and perceptions of a VME strategy for ESS. Participants completed 3 surveys before, immediately after, and 1 year following the course to assess their perceptions of the training, its contribution to their clinical practice, and the feasibility of implementing ESS in a timely manner.Results: In total, 996 specialists from 27 countries were enrolled. Approximately 38% (n=371) of the original respondents completed the course satisfactorily, met the certification requirements, and answered the second survey, reporting 97.8% satisfaction with a score greater than 8 points out of 10. Furthermore, 93.1% stated that the course significantly contributed to their clinical practice. At 1.11± 0.08 years after completing the course, 88 participants (24% of participants who completed the course) answered the final survey. The percentage of participants who had performed some ESS increased from 39.2% to 60.8% (p<0.05). More than 60% of the participants received some additional training.Conclusions: Medical education underwent significant changes following the COVID-19 pandemic. Developing curricular programs with VME tools can reduce training costs and time, while achieving high satisfaction and positive, measurable impacts. The final success of the training is the implementation of the techniques with a low complication rate.

Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and TechniqueVol. 10(2)
American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Surgical Simulation and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.