Robotic-assisted versus minimally invasive mitral valve repair: a claims data analysis of clinical and cost outcomes
Robotic-assisted MVr was safe and comparable to Mini-MVr in terms of clinical outcomes and total inpatient costs, despite higher operative day costs. These findings support the feasibility of robotic-assisted MVr, particularly in high-volume centers.
Authors
- Goki Inno
- Kazuki Noda (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5931-6139)
- Yosuke Takahashi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2258-7204)
- Munehide Nagao
- T. Kawase (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9630-3473)
- Kenta Nishiya
- Toshihiko Shibata (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1241-5065)
- Akimasa Morisaki (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9736-5257)
- Yukihiro Nishimoto
- Ryo Nangoya
Institutions
- Osaka Metropolitan University (JP)
- Tokyo Metropolitan University (JP)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Thoracic Disease
- Published
- 2025-10-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-2025-1086
- Primary Topic
- Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00