Uhm… The use of hesitation markers on the social media platform X in Dutch and Spanish

Abstract The status of hesitation markers or filled pauses (e.g., eh, uhm ) is debated, with some claiming that these forms merely signal disfluencies or delays in conversation, while others argue that they are lexical items. Although more common in oral communication, hesitation markers have been attested in written communication too, such as in tweets. Due to the nature of written language, hesitation markers in tweets must be intentionally produced; it follows that they fulfill a pragmatic function. However, not much is known yet about these pragmatic functions. We qualitatively explore the functions of hesitation markers in a corpus of Dutch and Spanish tweets. We not only show that they have a clear pragmatic function, but also that they can have a clear interactive and intersubjective function, in that they comment on the content of the contribution of their interlocutor and how this content conflicts with assumed common knowledge.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nota Bene
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/nb.00032.car
Primary Topic
Digital Communication and Language
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uhm… The use of hesitation markers on the social media platform X in Dutch and Spanish

Lotte Hogeweg, Patricia Sánchez Carrasco, Imke Wets
Nota Bene
Digital Communication and Language
article

Uhm… The use of hesitation markers on the social media platform X in Dutch and Spanish

Lotte Hogeweg, Patricia Sánchez Carrasco, Imke Wets
article en

Abstract

Abstract The status of hesitation markers or filled pauses (e.g., eh, uhm ) is debated, with some claiming that these forms merely signal disfluencies or delays in conversation, while others argue that they are lexical items. Although more common in oral communication, hesitation markers have been attested in written communication too, such as in tweets. Due to the nature of written language, hesitation markers in tweets must be intentionally produced; it follows that they fulfill a pragmatic function. However, not much is known yet about these pragmatic functions. We qualitatively explore the functions of hesitation markers in a corpus of Dutch and Spanish tweets. We not only show that they have a clear pragmatic function, but also that they can have a clear interactive and intersubjective function, in that they comment on the content of the contribution of their interlocutor and how this content conflicts with assumed common knowledge.

Nota BeneVol. 2(2)
Meertens Institute (NL)
Radboud Universiteit
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Digital Communication and Language
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.