Language and the brain

Abstract This article discusses some aspects of the historical and contemporaneous context of the 19th-century discovery of language centers in the human brain by the neurologists Broca and Wernicke. The first part deals with (1) earlier theorizing about the bodily locus of mental faculties and about the nature of aphasic disorders, and (2) the 19th-century emergence of research facilities in large hospitals. Together, these developments enabled successful aphasia-based search for language centers. Its main result, the Broca-Wernicke model, soon acquired benchmark status, but was never uncontroversial. The article’s second part discusses the remarkable disconnectedness of 19th-century neurology/aphasiology and 19th-century linguistics. In recent historiography, several plausible factors have been mentioned to explain this regrettable lack of contact. The suggestion that the neurologists’ neglect of syntax could have been prevented by a rapprochement with contemporaneous linguistics has to be rejected, however.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nota Bene
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/nb.00035.elf
Primary Topic
Neurology and Historical Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Language and the brain

Els Elffers
Nota Bene
Neurology and Historical Studies
article

Language and the brain

Els Elffers
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article discusses some aspects of the historical and contemporaneous context of the 19th-century discovery of language centers in the human brain by the neurologists Broca and Wernicke. The first part deals with (1) earlier theorizing about the bodily locus of mental faculties and about the nature of aphasic disorders, and (2) the 19th-century emergence of research facilities in large hospitals. Together, these developments enabled successful aphasia-based search for language centers. Its main result, the Broca-Wernicke model, soon acquired benchmark status, but was never uncontroversial. The article’s second part discusses the remarkable disconnectedness of 19th-century neurology/aphasiology and 19th-century linguistics. In recent historiography, several plausible factors have been mentioned to explain this regrettable lack of contact. The suggestion that the neurologists’ neglect of syntax could have been prevented by a rapprochement with contemporaneous linguistics has to be rejected, however.

Nota BeneVol. 2(2)
Meertens Institute (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Neurology and Historical Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.