Gender differences in institutional trust and covid-19 vaccines uptake in Ghana

One of the most studied social phenomena since the emergence of the covid-19 pandemic is trust. This renewed interest demonstrates the crucial role of trust in crises management. Unfortunately, most of the studies on trust have been conducted without considerations to saliant social categorisations like gender that might matter on how trust is built and radiated. This is despite differing socialisations of gender values in social contexts and how that might translate into how trust is built and demonstrated. The goal of this study, therefore, was to examine prevailing gendered patterns of institutional trust and how that might translate into the uptake of covid-19 vaccines in Ghana. We conducted logistic regression analyses on a sample of 1692 individual responses from a cross-sectional survey that was collected between October and November 2022 across four cities in Ghana. Results show that women were more trusting and were consequently more likely to take the vaccine in comparison to men. Interaction analysis further revealed that even when both men and women trusted a lot in relevant institutions like health, women were about 64% more likely to take the vaccine in comparison to men. Only men were significantly less likely to take the vaccine if they had trust concerns with political institutions. But both men and women were less likely to take the vaccine if they had trust concerns with health institutions. This study underscores the need for gender-specific policy programmes on public health issues.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Public Health
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-25092-y
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gender differences in institutional trust and covid-19 vaccines uptake in Ghana

Vincent Kuuire, Elijah Bisung, Irenius Konkor, Florence Dery et al.
BMC Public Health
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
article

Gender differences in institutional trust and covid-19 vaccines uptake in Ghana

Vincent Kuuire, Elijah Bisung, Irenius Konkor, Florence Dery, Ebenezer Dassah
article en

Abstract

One of the most studied social phenomena since the emergence of the covid-19 pandemic is trust. This renewed interest demonstrates the crucial role of trust in crises management. Unfortunately, most of the studies on trust have been conducted without considerations to saliant social categorisations like gender that might matter on how trust is built and radiated. This is despite differing socialisations of gender values in social contexts and how that might translate into how trust is built and demonstrated. The goal of this study, therefore, was to examine prevailing gendered patterns of institutional trust and how that might translate into the uptake of covid-19 vaccines in Ghana. We conducted logistic regression analyses on a sample of 1692 individual responses from a cross-sectional survey that was collected between October and November 2022 across four cities in Ghana. Results show that women were more trusting and were consequently more likely to take the vaccine in comparison to men. Interaction analysis further revealed that even when both men and women trusted a lot in relevant institutions like health, women were about 64% more likely to take the vaccine in comparison to men. Only men were significantly less likely to take the vaccine if they had trust concerns with political institutions. But both men and women were less likely to take the vaccine if they had trust concerns with health institutions. This study underscores the need for gender-specific policy programmes on public health issues.

BMC Public HealthVol. 25(1)
University of Toronto (CA), Queen's University (CA), Knoxville College (US), Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (GH), University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
Canada Research Chairs, University of Toronto, University of Toronto Mississauga, Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.