Combining the Borda Count with Approval and Disapproval Voting

Abstract In this paper, we extend preference-approval structures to a more general situation, where voters can sort the alternatives in three disjoint classes instead of two (for instance, acceptable, neutral and unacceptable). We propose a parameterized family of voting systems related to the Borda count, where positive (negative) individual scores are assigned to acceptable (unacceptable) alternatives in a decreasing way from best to worst, while neutral alternatives obtain null scores. We analyze the role of parameters and provide some properties that satisfy the proposed voting systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Group Decision and Negotiation
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-025-09953-w
Primary Topic
Game Theory and Voting Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Combining the Borda Count with Approval and Disapproval Voting

José Luis Garcı́a-Lapresta, Miguel Martínez-Panero
Group Decision and Negotiation
Game Theory and Voting Systems
article

Combining the Borda Count with Approval and Disapproval Voting

José Luis Garcı́a-Lapresta, Miguel Martínez-Panero
article en

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, we extend preference-approval structures to a more general situation, where voters can sort the alternatives in three disjoint classes instead of two (for instance, acceptable, neutral and unacceptable). We propose a parameterized family of voting systems related to the Borda count, where positive (negative) individual scores are assigned to acceptable (unacceptable) alternatives in a decreasing way from best to worst, while neutral alternatives obtain null scores. We analyze the role of parameters and provide some properties that satisfy the proposed voting systems.

Group Decision and NegotiationVol. 34(6)
Universidad de Valladolid (ES)
Universiteit Maastricht, European Regional Development Fund, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Game Theory and Voting Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.