High-concentration doxorubicin in cTACE: a retrospective cohort study of efficacy and safety

Abstract Purpose TACE is the standard treatment for intermediate-stage unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. However, the optimal concentration of doxorubicin in cTACE remains uncertain. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of high-concentration doxorubicin (25 mg/mL) compared to a lower concentration (2 mg/mL) in patients undergoing cTACE. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted on HCC patients who underwent conventional TACE with either 2 mg/mL or 25 mg/mL doxorubicin. The primary outcome was overall survival, and secondary outcomes included disease response, disease-free survival, and adverse events. Kaplan–Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to assess survival outcomes, adjusting for baseline characteristics such as Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage, Child–Pugh score, and ECOG performance status. Results No statistically significant difference in overall survival was observed between the two groups ( p = 0.757), with median survival of 788 days (25.6 months) in the low-concentration group and 710 days (23.3 months) in the high-concentration group. Cox regression analysis revealed significantly increased mortality risk in advanced BCLC stages (Stage B: HR 5.51, p = 0.004; Stage C: HR 8.83, p = 0.003) compared to Stage A. Disease response and DFS at 1, 2, and 3-year intervals showed no significant differences. Adverse event rates were comparable, with no significant increase in post-embolization syndrome in the high-concentration group ( p = 0.617). Conclusion No significant difference in survival, treatment response, or adverse events was demonstrated between groups. Baseline differences suggest a shift towards offering treatment to patients with more advanced disease in the later cohort.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
CVIR Oncology
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44343-025-00022-2
Primary Topic
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

High-concentration doxorubicin in cTACE: a retrospective cohort study of efficacy and safety

Siobhan Lee, Elliot Lee, Christian Abel
CVIR Oncology
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
article

High-concentration doxorubicin in cTACE: a retrospective cohort study of efficacy and safety

Siobhan Lee, Elliot Lee, Christian Abel
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose TACE is the standard treatment for intermediate-stage unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. However, the optimal concentration of doxorubicin in cTACE remains uncertain. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of high-concentration doxorubicin (25 mg/mL) compared to a lower concentration (2 mg/mL) in patients undergoing cTACE. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted on HCC patients who underwent conventional TACE with either 2 mg/mL or 25 mg/mL doxorubicin. The primary outcome was overall survival, and secondary outcomes included disease response, disease-free survival, and adverse events. Kaplan–Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to assess survival outcomes, adjusting for baseline characteristics such as Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage, Child–Pugh score, and ECOG performance status. Results No statistically significant difference in overall survival was observed between the two groups ( p = 0.757), with median survival of 788 days (25.6 months) in the low-concentration group and 710 days (23.3 months) in the high-concentration group. Cox regression analysis revealed significantly increased mortality risk in advanced BCLC stages (Stage B: HR 5.51, p = 0.004; Stage C: HR 8.83, p = 0.003) compared to Stage A. Disease response and DFS at 1, 2, and 3-year intervals showed no significant differences. Adverse event rates were comparable, with no significant increase in post-embolization syndrome in the high-concentration group ( p = 0.617). Conclusion No significant difference in survival, treatment response, or adverse events was demonstrated between groups. Baseline differences suggest a shift towards offering treatment to patients with more advanced disease in the later cohort.

CVIR OncologyVol. 1(1)
John Hunter Hospital (AU), University of New England (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.