Ancient Greek observations of T Coronae Borealis? Data and methodologies

The “new star” which, according to Pliny the Elder, inspired Hipparchus to compile his star catalogue was not a comet and may have been the recurrent nova T Coronae Borealis. I first scrutinize Pliny’s sometimes over-interpreted report (surely based on a lost work by Hipparchus), then the evidence for Hipparchus’s dates. Data from Chinese annals, revised recently, point to a nova in the Libra–Scorpius region in 134 bc , probably too late in Hipparchus’s life to support Pliny’s claim. Likewise, the comet reported by Seneca and Justin, sometimes linked to this story, is now redated to 135 bc . After recalculating the interval between the 1866 and 1946 eruptions of T CrB, I confirm those posited for 1787 and 1217, using an English chronicle to refine the date of the latter. We know Hipparchus observed Corona Borealis; but the variation in intervals since ad 1217 rules out simple arithmetical reckoning of when T erupted during the 2nd century bc . More positive evidence comes from a suggestion that the naming of Coma Berenices in about 245 bc was inspired by an event in CrB. Given T’s roughly 80-year cycle, this suggests an eruption in the 160s, early in Hipparchus’s active life.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal for the History of Astronomy
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00218286251369500
Primary Topic
Historical Astronomy and Related Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ancient Greek observations of T Coronae Borealis? Data and methodologies

Graham Shipley
Journal for the History of Astronomy
Historical Astronomy and Related Studies
article

Ancient Greek observations of T Coronae Borealis? Data and methodologies

Graham Shipley
article en

Abstract

The “new star” which, according to Pliny the Elder, inspired Hipparchus to compile his star catalogue was not a comet and may have been the recurrent nova T Coronae Borealis. I first scrutinize Pliny’s sometimes over-interpreted report (surely based on a lost work by Hipparchus), then the evidence for Hipparchus’s dates. Data from Chinese annals, revised recently, point to a nova in the Libra–Scorpius region in 134 bc , probably too late in Hipparchus’s life to support Pliny’s claim. Likewise, the comet reported by Seneca and Justin, sometimes linked to this story, is now redated to 135 bc . After recalculating the interval between the 1866 and 1946 eruptions of T CrB, I confirm those posited for 1787 and 1217, using an English chronicle to refine the date of the latter. We know Hipparchus observed Corona Borealis; but the variation in intervals since ad 1217 rules out simple arithmetical reckoning of when T erupted during the 2nd century bc . More positive evidence comes from a suggestion that the naming of Coma Berenices in about 245 bc was inspired by an event in CrB. Given T’s roughly 80-year cycle, this suggests an eruption in the 160s, early in Hipparchus’s active life.

Journal for the History of AstronomyVol. 56(4)
University of Leicester (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Historical Astronomy and Related Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Ancient Greek observations of T Coronae Borealis? Data and methodologies — Graham Shipley · Journal for the History of Astronomy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS