Direct regeneration of spent LiFePO <sub>4</sub> cathode materials: challenges, strategies, modifications, and economic benefits

Abstract The exponential surge in global demand for clean energy has significantly propelled the extensive deployment of lithium‐ion batteries (LIBs), which serve as pivotal energy storage components. As the initial generation of commercial LIBs progressively reaches their end‐of‐life stage, the recycling of spent lithium iron phosphate batteries (SLFPs) and the associated resource regeneration and utilization have emerged as critical concerns within the industry. This review compiles and evaluates the most recent advancements in the direct regeneration of SLFPs cathode materials. A comprehensive analysis is conducted to elucidate the fundamental causes of material degradation and the attendant technical challenges. Additionally, an in‐depth summary of the prevalent direct regeneration methodologies employed in recent years is presented, encompassing the solid‐phase sintering technique, hydrothermal process, molten salt method, and electrochemical approach. Furthermore, the investigation delves into the underlying mechanisms by which surface modification techniques and ion‐doping strategies influence the performance characteristics of regenerated materials. From an economic perspective, a comparative assessment of the costs and revenues associated with various regeneration technologies is performed. Conclusively, in light of the existing limitations in current research, prospective directions are proposed, including the establishment of a comprehensive recycling and utilization framework, the facilitation of industrial implementation, and the refinement of characterization techniques for spent batteries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Rare Metals
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12598-025-03646-8
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Extraction and Separation Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.14
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Direct regeneration of spent LiFePO 4 cathode materials: challenges, strategies, modifications, and economic benefits

Chuanyu Bie, Houzhao Wan, Yin Xu, Lin Lv et al.
3 citations
Rare Metals
Extraction and Separation Processes
2.14
article

Direct regeneration of spent LiFePO 4 cathode materials: challenges, strategies, modifications, and economic benefits

Chuanyu Bie, Houzhao Wan, Yin Xu, Lin Lv, Jiayong Pan, Han-Bing Wang, Liu Chun-Lei, Xiaolong Bao, Jingyu Li, Yutong Zhang
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract The exponential surge in global demand for clean energy has significantly propelled the extensive deployment of lithium‐ion batteries (LIBs), which serve as pivotal energy storage components. As the initial generation of commercial LIBs progressively reaches their end‐of‐life stage, the recycling of spent lithium iron phosphate batteries (SLFPs) and the associated resource regeneration and utilization have emerged as critical concerns within the industry. This review compiles and evaluates the most recent advancements in the direct regeneration of SLFPs cathode materials. A comprehensive analysis is conducted to elucidate the fundamental causes of material degradation and the attendant technical challenges. Additionally, an in‐depth summary of the prevalent direct regeneration methodologies employed in recent years is presented, encompassing the solid‐phase sintering technique, hydrothermal process, molten salt method, and electrochemical approach. Furthermore, the investigation delves into the underlying mechanisms by which surface modification techniques and ion‐doping strategies influence the performance characteristics of regenerated materials. From an economic perspective, a comparative assessment of the costs and revenues associated with various regeneration technologies is performed. Conclusively, in light of the existing limitations in current research, prospective directions are proposed, including the establishment of a comprehensive recycling and utilization framework, the facilitation of industrial implementation, and the refinement of characterization techniques for spent batteries.

Rare MetalsVol. 44(12)
Battery Park (US), Hubei University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Extraction and Separation Processes
2.14
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.