Why Has in‐Work Poverty Risen in Britain?

ABSTRACT Is work a reliable route out of poverty, and what does that depend upon? In Britain, the headline relative poverty rate for those in working households steadily rose from 13.4% in 1994–95 to 18.4% in 2019–20. We study the drivers of this increase. Significant rises in earnings inequality observed over the period were a modest contributor, accounting for 1.3 percentage points (pp). Higher earnings growth for poorer families did not reduce working poverty more substantially, in part due to the higher effective marginal tax rates that low‐income families faced. A more important factor (1.8 pp) was rising housing costs for poorer working families compared with middle‐ or high‐income families, driven both by rents rising relative to mortgages, and by a shift away from homeownership for poorer working families. Growth in pensioner incomes, which raised median income and therefore the relative poverty line, also increased the in‐work poverty rate (1.7 pp). Reforms to the tax and transfer system—particularly the introduction of ‘tax credits’—served to slightly mitigate (0.6 pp) the rise in in‐work poverty. These results show that the effectiveness of employment for reducing poverty is dependent upon a broad range of other factors—many of which themselves can be shaped by other policy levers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/obes.70027
Primary Topic
Social Issues and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why Has in‐Work Poverty Risen in Britain?

Tom Waters, Jonathan Cribb, Xiaowei Xu
Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics
Social Issues and Policies
article

Why Has in‐Work Poverty Risen in Britain?

Tom Waters, Jonathan Cribb, Xiaowei Xu
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Is work a reliable route out of poverty, and what does that depend upon? In Britain, the headline relative poverty rate for those in working households steadily rose from 13.4% in 1994–95 to 18.4% in 2019–20. We study the drivers of this increase. Significant rises in earnings inequality observed over the period were a modest contributor, accounting for 1.3 percentage points (pp). Higher earnings growth for poorer families did not reduce working poverty more substantially, in part due to the higher effective marginal tax rates that low‐income families faced. A more important factor (1.8 pp) was rising housing costs for poorer working families compared with middle‐ or high‐income families, driven both by rents rising relative to mortgages, and by a shift away from homeownership for poorer working families. Growth in pensioner incomes, which raised median income and therefore the relative poverty line, also increased the in‐work poverty rate (1.7 pp). Reforms to the tax and transfer system—particularly the introduction of ‘tax credits’—served to slightly mitigate (0.6 pp) the rise in in‐work poverty. These results show that the effectiveness of employment for reducing poverty is dependent upon a broad range of other factors—many of which themselves can be shaped by other policy levers.

Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics
Institute for Fiscal Studies (GB), University College London (GB)
Economic and Social Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Social Issues and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Why Has in‐Work Poverty Risen in Britain? — Tom Waters, Jonathan Cribb, et al. · Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS