RETHINKING LEGISLATIVE TERM LIMITS: SAFEGUARDING DEMOCRATIC RENEWAL IN CONSTITUTIONAL STATE OF INDONESIA

Indonesia’s constitutional framework enshrines the separation of powers among the executive, legislative, and judicial branches, yet only the legislature lacks explicit term‐limit provisions for its members. This normative legal analysis examines the democratic and legal implications arising from this regulatory gap and proposes strategies to safeguard legislative renewal. Utilizing primarily on secondary sources—statutes, academic literature, and comparative analyses—the research employed both statutory and conceptual approaches to assess existing laws, notably Law No. 17 of 2014 on the People’s Consultative Assembly and House of Representatives and Law No. 7 of 2017 on General Elections. The analysis identifies three core deficiencies: first, the lack of term limits undermines legal certainty by leaving tenure duration indeterminate and susceptible to arbitrary interpretation; second, unlimited re‐election fosters power entrenchment, increasing risks of corruption, collusion, and nepotism, and weakening the legislature’s oversight and budgetary functions; third, perpetual incumbency impedes generational renewal, diminishing internal party democracy and restricting political recruitment. Drawing comparative insights from Australia’s staggered Senate terms illustrate how structured tenure can promote dynamism while retaining institutional memory. In response, the study advocates for a clear legislative amendment that caps legislators’ service to two consecutive terms, aligned with principles of accountability, rotation of power, and open political recruitment. Additionally, it recommends that political parties institutionalize transparent internal mechanisms and enforce term‐limit rules to ensure cadre development and democratic governance. By codifying legislative term limits and fostering proactive party roles, Indonesia can strengthen constitutional checks and balances, enhance the legislative quality, and secure sustainable democratic renewal.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diponegoro Law Review
Published
2025-04-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14710/dilrev.10.1.2025.16-28
Primary Topic
Indonesian Election Politics and Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

RETHINKING LEGISLATIVE TERM LIMITS: SAFEGUARDING DEMOCRATIC RENEWAL IN CONSTITUTIONAL STATE OF INDONESIA

Aprista Ristyawati, Willy Naresta Hanum, Yos Johan Utama, Lita Tyesta Addy Listya Wardhani
Diponegoro Law Review
Indonesian Election Politics and Participation
article

RETHINKING LEGISLATIVE TERM LIMITS: SAFEGUARDING DEMOCRATIC RENEWAL IN CONSTITUTIONAL STATE OF INDONESIA

Aprista Ristyawati, Willy Naresta Hanum, Yos Johan Utama, Lita Tyesta Addy Listya Wardhani
article en

Abstract

Indonesia’s constitutional framework enshrines the separation of powers among the executive, legislative, and judicial branches, yet only the legislature lacks explicit term‐limit provisions for its members. This normative legal analysis examines the democratic and legal implications arising from this regulatory gap and proposes strategies to safeguard legislative renewal. Utilizing primarily on secondary sources—statutes, academic literature, and comparative analyses—the research employed both statutory and conceptual approaches to assess existing laws, notably Law No. 17 of 2014 on the People’s Consultative Assembly and House of Representatives and Law No. 7 of 2017 on General Elections. The analysis identifies three core deficiencies: first, the lack of term limits undermines legal certainty by leaving tenure duration indeterminate and susceptible to arbitrary interpretation; second, unlimited re‐election fosters power entrenchment, increasing risks of corruption, collusion, and nepotism, and weakening the legislature’s oversight and budgetary functions; third, perpetual incumbency impedes generational renewal, diminishing internal party democracy and restricting political recruitment. Drawing comparative insights from Australia’s staggered Senate terms illustrate how structured tenure can promote dynamism while retaining institutional memory. In response, the study advocates for a clear legislative amendment that caps legislators’ service to two consecutive terms, aligned with principles of accountability, rotation of power, and open political recruitment. Additionally, it recommends that political parties institutionalize transparent internal mechanisms and enforce term‐limit rules to ensure cadre development and democratic governance. By codifying legislative term limits and fostering proactive party roles, Indonesia can strengthen constitutional checks and balances, enhance the legislative quality, and secure sustainable democratic renewal.

Diponegoro Law ReviewVol. 10(1)
Diponegoro University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Indonesian Election Politics and Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

RETHINKING LEGISLATIVE TERM LIMITS: SAFEGUARDING DEMOCRATIC RENEWAL IN CONSTITUTIONAL STATE OF INDONESIA — Aprista Ristyawati, Willy Naresta Hanum, et al. · Diponegoro Law Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS