Comparing quantum and classical Monte Carlo algorithms for estimating Betti numbers of clique complexes

Several quantum and classical Monte Carlo algorithms for Betti Number Estimation (BNE) on clique complexes have recently been proposed, though it is unclear how their performances compare. We review these algorithms, emphasising their common Monte Carlo structure within a new modular framework. We derive upper bounds for the number of samples needed to reach a given level of precision, and use them to compare these algorithms. By recombining the different modules, we create a new quantum algorithm with an exponentially-improved dependence in the sample complexity. We run classical simulations to verify convergence within the theoretical bounds and observe the predicted exponential separation, even though empirical convergence occurs substantially earlier than the conservative theoretical bounds.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Quantum
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2025-10-31-1901
Primary Topic
Topological and Geometric Data Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing quantum and classical Monte Carlo algorithms for estimating Betti numbers of clique complexes

Ismail Yunus Akhalwaya, Steven Herbert, Ahmed Bhayat, Julien Sorci et al.
Quantum
Topological and Geometric Data Analysis
article

Comparing quantum and classical Monte Carlo algorithms for estimating Betti numbers of clique complexes

Ismail Yunus Akhalwaya, Steven Herbert, Ahmed Bhayat, Julien Sorci, Lior Horesh, Shashanka Ubaru, Adam Connolly
article en

Abstract

Several quantum and classical Monte Carlo algorithms for Betti Number Estimation (BNE) on clique complexes have recently been proposed, though it is unclear how their performances compare. We review these algorithms, emphasising their common Monte Carlo structure within a new modular framework. We derive upper bounds for the number of samples needed to reach a given level of precision, and use them to compare these algorithms. By recombining the different modules, we create a new quantum algorithm with an exponentially-improved dependence in the sample complexity. We run classical simulations to verify convergence within the theoretical bounds and observe the predicted exponential separation, even though empirical convergence occurs substantially earlier than the conservative theoretical bounds.

QuantumVol. 9
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Topological and Geometric Data Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.