Alleviating statistics anxiety in psychology: Learner and educator viewpoints understood using Brookfield’s Reflective Model

Statistics for psychology is a challenging aspect of undergraduate psychology courses but poorly understood in experiential terms. Accordingly, we drew on Brookfield’s ‘four lenses for critical reflection’ to acquire insights from first year psychology undergraduate free text survey responses (learner lens), and psychology educator survey free text responses (colleague lens) which were content analysed. Scholarly and autobiographical lenses were also generated via literature reviews and written activities, respectively. Wide-ranging relevant pedagogic processes and dynamics (e.g. peer-to-peer collaborative work, cognitive load; the importance of constructive alignment and verbal articulation) were highlighted from learner and colleague lenses. The scholarly lens underscored tendencies within the evidence base, and our autobiographies suggested how educator learning experiences served to facilitate compassionate and inclusive learning to mitigate impacts of statistics anxiety. Study findings produce a much-needed holistic account of statistics anxiety, prompt future research directions, and suggest priorities for classroom practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychology Teaching Review
Published
2025-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsptr.2025.31.2.82
Primary Topic
Statistics Education and Methodologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Alleviating statistics anxiety in psychology: Learner and educator viewpoints understood using Brookfield’s Reflective Model

Dominic Conroy, Mark Thompson, Bernard Aidoo, Raymon Hunte
Psychology Teaching Review
Statistics Education and Methodologies
article

Alleviating statistics anxiety in psychology: Learner and educator viewpoints understood using Brookfield’s Reflective Model

Dominic Conroy, Mark Thompson, Bernard Aidoo, Raymon Hunte
article en

Abstract

Statistics for psychology is a challenging aspect of undergraduate psychology courses but poorly understood in experiential terms. Accordingly, we drew on Brookfield’s ‘four lenses for critical reflection’ to acquire insights from first year psychology undergraduate free text survey responses (learner lens), and psychology educator survey free text responses (colleague lens) which were content analysed. Scholarly and autobiographical lenses were also generated via literature reviews and written activities, respectively. Wide-ranging relevant pedagogic processes and dynamics (e.g. peer-to-peer collaborative work, cognitive load; the importance of constructive alignment and verbal articulation) were highlighted from learner and colleague lenses. The scholarly lens underscored tendencies within the evidence base, and our autobiographies suggested how educator learning experiences served to facilitate compassionate and inclusive learning to mitigate impacts of statistics anxiety. Study findings produce a much-needed holistic account of statistics anxiety, prompt future research directions, and suggest priorities for classroom practices.

Psychology Teaching ReviewVol. 31(2)
London Metropolitan University (GB), United Nations Industrial Development Organization (AT), Huntsman (United States) (US), The Open University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Statistics Education and Methodologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.