Steering Great Barrier Reef climate science narratives through the mediasphere in a time of misinformation

The threat of climate change to the health of Australia’s Great Barrier Reef (GBR) is undisputed. However, news reporting about the GBR in recent years has often failed to accurately convey the risks to the reef of a heating climate, sometimes leading to discourses of climate change denial across the hybrid media landscape. This paper presents one such case where an Australian government research agency reporting about the state of coral cover on the GBR inadvertently fed into problematic reporting, and a spike in online climate science denial in the days following its release. The study traces media coverage and social media commentary following the report’s release, demonstrating how science communication became political and played into climate science denial online. We provide recommendations for the diverse communicators charged with the challenging task of translating, reporting and disseminating science information to help avoid unwittingly bolstering climate denial narratives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Climate Action
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44168-025-00235-4
Primary Topic
Climate Change Communication and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Steering Great Barrier Reef climate science narratives through the mediasphere in a time of misinformation

Ingrid E. van Putten, GT Pecl, Tiffany H. Morrison, Gabi Mocatta et al.
npj Climate Action
Climate Change Communication and Perception
article

Steering Great Barrier Reef climate science narratives through the mediasphere in a time of misinformation

Ingrid E. van Putten, GT Pecl, Tiffany H. Morrison, Gabi Mocatta, Matthew Andreotta, Carly Lubicz-Zaorski
article en

Abstract

The threat of climate change to the health of Australia’s Great Barrier Reef (GBR) is undisputed. However, news reporting about the GBR in recent years has often failed to accurately convey the risks to the reef of a heating climate, sometimes leading to discourses of climate change denial across the hybrid media landscape. This paper presents one such case where an Australian government research agency reporting about the state of coral cover on the GBR inadvertently fed into problematic reporting, and a spike in online climate science denial in the days following its release. The study traces media coverage and social media commentary following the report’s release, demonstrating how science communication became political and played into climate science denial online. We provide recommendations for the diverse communicators charged with the challenging task of translating, reporting and disseminating science information to help avoid unwittingly bolstering climate denial narratives.

npj Climate ActionVol. 4(1)
CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere (AU), University of Tasmania (AU), Queensland University of Technology (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), Centre for Marine Socioecology (AU), James Cook University (AU), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Australian Government
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Climate Change Communication and Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Steering Great Barrier Reef climate science narratives through the mediasphere in a time of misinformation — Ingrid E. van Putten, GT Pecl, et al. · npj Climate Action (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS