EAMHID 2025

Background: Decline in functioning, due to ageing, of persons with visual and intellectual disabilities can result in an increase of complex care needs. Ageing can lead, for example, to frailty, chronic health conditions and an increase in dependency. Healthcare professionals, on the other hand, are trained to stimulate independency and participation in society, values that are embedded in the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. As a result, caring for ageing persons with a visual and intellectual disability may come with a conflict in values. For example, should caregivers stimulate participation or rather comfort an ageing client with increasing frailty? However, to date, the moral dilemmas caregivers may face and which values they find important in the care of ageing persons with a visual and intellectual disability are not reported. Therefore, the aim of this study is to examine these moral dilemmas and values.<br/><br/>Method: Using a qualitative method, 31 semi-structured interviews were conducted with relatives (n=15) and healthcare professionals (n=16) of ageing persons with a visual and intellectual disability, including both specialists in ethics (like chaplains) and generalists in ethics (other healthcare professionals). The interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. The data were analysed in Atlas.ti, using a thematic approach (Braun and Clarke 2022). In this study, the recommendation of a three-round Delphi study (Okoli and Pawlowski 2004) is followed: (1) to identify moral dilemmas, (2) to narrow down the number of moral dilemmas and (3) to find consensus on which dilemmas are most important. This study is preregistered at OSF: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/9GBMW.<br/><br/>Results: At the end of the study, we aim to have an overview of common moral dilemmas, important values and themes in the care of ageing persons with a visual and intellectual disability. Preliminary analysis of the first round has identified a number of moral dilemmas caregivers face in the care of the ageing client. For example, should caregivers focus on health or prioritize the quality of life of an ageing client with health issues? At the conference, the full thematic analysis of the first round will be presented.<br/><br/>Conclusions: The results will provide insight into the most common moral dilemmas and themes in the care of ageing persons with a visual and intellectual disability. Moreover, the results contribute to a better understanding of when caregivers face a contrast in values, what is decisive when making a choice and which values they find important in the care of the ageing client.<br/><br/>References<br/>Braun, V., &amp; Clarke, V. (2022). Toward good practice in thematic analysis: Avoiding common problems and be(com)ing a knowing researcher. International Journal of Transgender Health, 24(1), 1–6.<br/>Okoli, C., &amp; Pawlowski, S. D. (2004). The Delphi method as a research tool: An example, design considerations and applications. Information and Management, 42(1), 15–29.

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.70044
Primary Topic
Disability Rights and Representation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EAMHID 2025

Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
Disability Rights and Representation
article

EAMHID 2025

article en

Abstract

Background: Decline in functioning, due to ageing, of persons with visual and intellectual disabilities can result in an increase of complex care needs. Ageing can lead, for example, to frailty, chronic health conditions and an increase in dependency. Healthcare professionals, on the other hand, are trained to stimulate independency and participation in society, values that are embedded in the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. As a result, caring for ageing persons with a visual and intellectual disability may come with a conflict in values. For example, should caregivers stimulate participation or rather comfort an ageing client with increasing frailty? However, to date, the moral dilemmas caregivers may face and which values they find important in the care of ageing persons with a visual and intellectual disability are not reported. Therefore, the aim of this study is to examine these moral dilemmas and values.<br/><br/>Method: Using a qualitative method, 31 semi-structured interviews were conducted with relatives (n=15) and healthcare professionals (n=16) of ageing persons with a visual and intellectual disability, including both specialists in ethics (like chaplains) and generalists in ethics (other healthcare professionals). The interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. The data were analysed in Atlas.ti, using a thematic approach (Braun and Clarke 2022). In this study, the recommendation of a three-round Delphi study (Okoli and Pawlowski 2004) is followed: (1) to identify moral dilemmas, (2) to narrow down the number of moral dilemmas and (3) to find consensus on which dilemmas are most important. This study is preregistered at OSF: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/9GBMW.<br/><br/>Results: At the end of the study, we aim to have an overview of common moral dilemmas, important values and themes in the care of ageing persons with a visual and intellectual disability. Preliminary analysis of the first round has identified a number of moral dilemmas caregivers face in the care of the ageing client. For example, should caregivers focus on health or prioritize the quality of life of an ageing client with health issues? At the conference, the full thematic analysis of the first round will be presented.<br/><br/>Conclusions: The results will provide insight into the most common moral dilemmas and themes in the care of ageing persons with a visual and intellectual disability. Moreover, the results contribute to a better understanding of when caregivers face a contrast in values, what is decisive when making a choice and which values they find important in the care of the ageing client.<br/><br/>References<br/>Braun, V., &amp; Clarke, V. (2022). Toward good practice in thematic analysis: Avoiding common problems and be(com)ing a knowing researcher. International Journal of Transgender Health, 24(1), 1–6.<br/>Okoli, C., &amp; Pawlowski, S. D. (2004). The Delphi method as a research tool: An example, design considerations and applications. Information and Management, 42(1), 15–29.

Journal of Intellectual Disability ResearchVol. 69(10)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Disability Rights and Representation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.