Synthesis of a Modified Biosorbent from Lignocellulosic Biomass: Comparative Adsorption Performance with an Activated Carbon of the Same Origin
Mango seed shells were used as a precursor for the synthesis of two adsorbent materials: an activated carbon (AC-MSS) and a modified biosorbent (MB-MSS). The AC preparation process was optimised by evaluating the specific surface area under various activation parameters, while the selection of the most effective MB-MSS was based on its paracetamol removal efficiency. Optimal conditions for AC-MSS synthesis were identified as activation with 40% phosphoric acid, an impregnation ratio of 1.5 (mass of chemical agent/mass of precursor), and carbonisation at 450˚C for 90 min. For MB-MSS, the sample prepared with a sulphuric acid impregnation ratio of 2.5 exhibited the highest adsorption capacity. Both materials were characterised using X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM/EDX), and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). Kinetic studies revealed that paracetamol adsorption onto both materials followed a pseudo-second-order model. Additionally, equilibrium data for both adsorbents fitted well to both Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm models. According to the Langmuir model, the maximum adsorption capacities were 44.84 mg/g for AC-MSS and 9.82 mg/g for MB-MSS.
Authors
- Akpénè Amenuvevega Dougna (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7130-4453)
- Catherine Charcosset (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3806-9540)
- Ibrahim Tchakala
- Laurent Vanoye (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6029-6390)
- Seyf-Laye Alfa-Sika Mande (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2221-706X)
- Koffi Fiaty
- Limam Moctar Bawa
- Faouzou Ouro-Agoro
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Materials Science and Chemical Engineering
- Published
- 2025-01-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.4236/msce.2025.1310004
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.63