Towards Scalable Evaluation of Software Understanding: A Methodology Proposal

In reverse engineering our goal is to build systems that help people to understand software. However, the field has not converged on a way to measure software understanding. In this paper, we make the case that understanding should be measured via performance on understanding-questions. We propose a method for constructing understanding-questions and evaluating answers at scale. We conduct a case study in which we apply our method and compare Ghidra’s default auto analysis with an analysis that supports binary constructs that are specific to Objective-C.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3733822.3764672
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Software Engineering Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards Scalable Evaluation of Software Understanding: A Methodology Proposal

J. Zabel, C. Fischer, M. Wache, Florian Magin et al.
1 citations
Software Engineering Research
3.25
article

Towards Scalable Evaluation of Software Understanding: A Methodology Proposal

J. Zabel, C. Fischer, M. Wache, Florian Magin, Fabian Scherf
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In reverse engineering our goal is to build systems that help people to understand software. However, the field has not converged on a way to measure software understanding. In this paper, we make the case that understanding should be measured via performance on understanding-questions. We propose a method for constructing understanding-questions and evaluating answers at scale. We conduct a case study in which we apply our method and compare Ghidra’s default auto analysis with an analysis that supports binary constructs that are specific to Objective-C.

Fraunhofer Institute for Secure Information Technology (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Software Engineering Research
3.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.