Field analysis of trust in orthopedic surgeons vs traditional bone setters among low-income individuals in Nineveh Governorate

This cross-sectional study investigates trust levels in orthopedic surgeons versus traditional bone setters among low-income individuals in Nineveh Governorate. A total of 158 participants completed a structured survey. Results showed that 60.2% of respondents preferred orthopedic surgeons, while 33.5% favored traditional healers. The most frequent trust rating was 4/5 for orthopedic surgeons and 2–3/5 for traditional healers. Notably, 68% of respondents held a university degree, and 87% were male, which indicates selection bias and limits the generalizability of the findings. Trust was strongly influenced by education, affordability, and cultural familiarity. The study recommends improving outreach, reducing treatment costs, and strengthening culturally sensitive communication to build public trust in licensed orthopedic care. • Investigates trust levels between orthopedic surgeons and traditional bone setters among low-income individuals in Nineveh Governorate. • Surveyed 158 participants, revealing 60.2% preference for orthopedic surgeons despite cultural ties to traditional healers. • Education level strongly influences trust, with higher education linked to greater confidence in orthopedic care. • Affordability, accessibility, and cultural familiarity drive continued use of traditional bone setters. • Recommendations include improved communication, subsidized care, and culturally sensitive outreach to enhance trust in licensed orthopedic services.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Orthopaedic Reports
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jorep.2025.100790
Primary Topic
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Field analysis of trust in orthopedic surgeons vs traditional bone setters among low-income individuals in Nineveh Governorate

Ibrahim Mohammed Fawzi Al-Shahwani
Journal of Orthopaedic Reports
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
article

Field analysis of trust in orthopedic surgeons vs traditional bone setters among low-income individuals in Nineveh Governorate

Ibrahim Mohammed Fawzi Al-Shahwani
article en

Abstract

This cross-sectional study investigates trust levels in orthopedic surgeons versus traditional bone setters among low-income individuals in Nineveh Governorate. A total of 158 participants completed a structured survey. Results showed that 60.2% of respondents preferred orthopedic surgeons, while 33.5% favored traditional healers. The most frequent trust rating was 4/5 for orthopedic surgeons and 2–3/5 for traditional healers. Notably, 68% of respondents held a university degree, and 87% were male, which indicates selection bias and limits the generalizability of the findings. Trust was strongly influenced by education, affordability, and cultural familiarity. The study recommends improving outreach, reducing treatment costs, and strengthening culturally sensitive communication to build public trust in licensed orthopedic care. • Investigates trust levels between orthopedic surgeons and traditional bone setters among low-income individuals in Nineveh Governorate. • Surveyed 158 participants, revealing 60.2% preference for orthopedic surgeons despite cultural ties to traditional healers. • Education level strongly influences trust, with higher education linked to greater confidence in orthopedic care. • Affordability, accessibility, and cultural familiarity drive continued use of traditional bone setters. • Recommendations include improved communication, subsidized care, and culturally sensitive outreach to enhance trust in licensed orthopedic services.

Journal of Orthopaedic Reports
Orthopaedic Trauma Association (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.