Evaluating microstructural variation in nanocomposites via thermoelastic stress analysis

This work reports distinct thermo-elastic behavior during the monotonic tensile loading of epoxy-based polymer matrix nanocomposites comprised of varying weight fractions (wt.%) of amine-functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT) and amine-functionalized graphene nanoplatelets (GNP). Four configurations—0.1 wt.% and 0.2 wt.% of CNT/epoxy and GNP/epoxy—were produced for this study. With the addition of nanofillers, an improvement in tensile strength of 36.00 ± 1.85% was achieved in 0.2 wt.% CNT/epoxy samples and 30.00 ± 4.08% in 0.1 wt.% GNP/epoxy compared to the baseline epoxy. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and thermomechanical analysis (TMA) were conducted to determine glass transition temperature ( T g ), specific heat capacity ( C p ), and coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) of baseline epoxy and the nanocomposites. Temperature profiles were measured during monotonic tests of nanocomposites using an infrared thermography (IRT) camera, yielding distinctive temperature-stress profiles based on thermoelastic stress analysis (TSA). The initial slopes of these temperature-stress plots, known as the thermoelastic constant ( K 0 ), were determined graphically for all the nanocomposite specimens. K 0 , thus obtained from monotonic testing, was in the same range of the values obtained from equivalent DSC/TMA measured values for the chosen nanocomposites in this study. Thus, K 0 measurements from TSA can be used as a novel way to discern a nanocomposite’s microstructural composition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites
Published
2025-07-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/07316844251360966
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Epoxy Resin Curing Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating microstructural variation in nanocomposites via thermoelastic stress analysis

Virginia A. Davis, Suhasini Gururaja, Julkarnyne M. Habibur Rahman
1 citations
Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites
Epoxy Resin Curing Processes
0.71
article

Evaluating microstructural variation in nanocomposites via thermoelastic stress analysis

Virginia A. Davis, Suhasini Gururaja, Julkarnyne M. Habibur Rahman
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This work reports distinct thermo-elastic behavior during the monotonic tensile loading of epoxy-based polymer matrix nanocomposites comprised of varying weight fractions (wt.%) of amine-functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT) and amine-functionalized graphene nanoplatelets (GNP). Four configurations—0.1 wt.% and 0.2 wt.% of CNT/epoxy and GNP/epoxy—were produced for this study. With the addition of nanofillers, an improvement in tensile strength of 36.00 ± 1.85% was achieved in 0.2 wt.% CNT/epoxy samples and 30.00 ± 4.08% in 0.1 wt.% GNP/epoxy compared to the baseline epoxy. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and thermomechanical analysis (TMA) were conducted to determine glass transition temperature ( T g ), specific heat capacity ( C p ), and coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) of baseline epoxy and the nanocomposites. Temperature profiles were measured during monotonic tests of nanocomposites using an infrared thermography (IRT) camera, yielding distinctive temperature-stress profiles based on thermoelastic stress analysis (TSA). The initial slopes of these temperature-stress plots, known as the thermoelastic constant ( K 0 ), were determined graphically for all the nanocomposite specimens. K 0 , thus obtained from monotonic testing, was in the same range of the values obtained from equivalent DSC/TMA measured values for the chosen nanocomposites in this study. Thus, K 0 measurements from TSA can be used as a novel way to discern a nanocomposite’s microstructural composition.

Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites
Auburn University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Epoxy Resin Curing Processes
0.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.