Prevalence, outcomes, and predictive factors: a systematic literature review to inform the development of EULAR Points to Consider for the definition of Difficult-to-Manage and Treatment-Refractory psoriatic arthritis

<h2>ABSTRACT</h2><h3>Objectives</h3> To perform a systematic literature review (SLR) to inform the EULAR Task Force "Points to Consider for the definitions of Difficult-to-Manage (D2M) and Treatment-Refractory (TR) psoriatic arthritis (PsA)". <h3>Methods</h3> The SLR addressed 3 separate questions concerning the following: (1) prevalence, (2) outcomes, and (3) predictors of D2M/TR PsA. A search was conducted in MEDLINE (Ovid), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CENTRAL, EMBASE, and Epistemonikos from inception to March 3, 2024, as well as EULAR/ACR abstracts for 2023/24 and 2022/23, respectively. This systematic review adhered to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and was registered on PROSPERO. Data are summarised descriptively. Meta-analysis was not possible due to significant heterogeneity and/or lack of high-quality evidence. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. <h3>Results</h3> Overall, 70, 4, and 25 articles/abstracts were included for questions 1, 2, and 3, respectively. For question 1, 30/70 records had low/moderate RoB, with the prevalence of D2T PsA ranging from 5% to 80% depending on both the timepoint at which prevalence was measured and the definition of D2M/TR PsA applied, which varied significantly between studies. For question 2, all records had a high RoB; therefore, no conclusions could be drawn. For question 3, all records had a moderate RoB, and 84 categories of potential predictors were identified, with large differences in strength and direction of association between studies. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Despite significant heterogeneity in the published literature regarding the scope, definition, long-term outcomes, and predictors of D2M/TR PsA, certain patterns emerged that helped shape the final EULAR Task Force recommendations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
EULAR Rheumatology Open
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ero.2025.07.007
Primary Topic
Spondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prevalence, outcomes, and predictive factors: a systematic literature review to inform the development of EULAR Points to Consider for the definition of Difficult-to-Manage and Treatment-Refractory psoriatic arthritis

Stephanie R Harrison, Cristina Clara Macía Villa, Helena Marzo‐Ortega, Louise Falzon et al.
EULAR Rheumatology Open
Spondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments
article

Prevalence, outcomes, and predictive factors: a systematic literature review to inform the development of EULAR Points to Consider for the definition of Difficult-to-Manage and Treatment-Refractory psoriatic arthritis

Stephanie R Harrison, Cristina Clara Macía Villa, Helena Marzo‐Ortega, Louise Falzon, Stefan Siebert, George E. Fragoulis, Xabier Michelena, Pedro Machado, Alexandre Rocha Sepriano
article en

Abstract

<h2>ABSTRACT</h2><h3>Objectives</h3> To perform a systematic literature review (SLR) to inform the EULAR Task Force "Points to Consider for the definitions of Difficult-to-Manage (D2M) and Treatment-Refractory (TR) psoriatic arthritis (PsA)". <h3>Methods</h3> The SLR addressed 3 separate questions concerning the following: (1) prevalence, (2) outcomes, and (3) predictors of D2M/TR PsA. A search was conducted in MEDLINE (Ovid), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CENTRAL, EMBASE, and Epistemonikos from inception to March 3, 2024, as well as EULAR/ACR abstracts for 2023/24 and 2022/23, respectively. This systematic review adhered to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and was registered on PROSPERO. Data are summarised descriptively. Meta-analysis was not possible due to significant heterogeneity and/or lack of high-quality evidence. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. <h3>Results</h3> Overall, 70, 4, and 25 articles/abstracts were included for questions 1, 2, and 3, respectively. For question 1, 30/70 records had low/moderate RoB, with the prevalence of D2T PsA ranging from 5% to 80% depending on both the timepoint at which prevalence was measured and the definition of D2M/TR PsA applied, which varied significantly between studies. For question 2, all records had a high RoB; therefore, no conclusions could be drawn. For question 3, all records had a moderate RoB, and 84 categories of potential predictors were identified, with large differences in strength and direction of association between studies. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Despite significant heterogeneity in the published literature regarding the scope, definition, long-term outcomes, and predictors of D2M/TR PsA, certain patterns emerged that helped shape the final EULAR Task Force recommendations.

EULAR Rheumatology Open
University of Leeds (GB), University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Queen Mary University of London (GB), Instituto Cajal (ES), Chapel Allerton Hospital (GB), Leiden University Medical Center (NL), London North West Healthcare NHS Trust (GB), Northwick Park Hospital (GB), National Institute for Health and Care Research (GB), Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari (ES), University College London (GB), Athens State University (US), University of Glasgow (GB), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (PT), University of Sheffield (GB)
National Institute for Health and Care Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Spondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.