Towards a New Stock Trading Model for a Kelly Betting Practitioner

The takeoff for this paper is the voluminous body of literature on Kelly Betting in the context of stock market trading. As far as motivation for this work is concerned, the following point is central: The vast preponderance of this literature begins by assuming some “underlying” theoretical model for stock prices, such as Geometric Brownian Motion (GBM), and typically uses empirical data to numerically estimate the parameters entering these dynamics on the way to constructing a trading strategy. In contrast to this literature, our approach in this paper has three salient features: First, no functional form such as GBM for the stock price dynamics is assumed. Second, in our new model for updating the account value, the number of shares held and the cash balance from stage k to k + 1 is entirely data driven based on empirical values of the quadruple (open, low, high, close) of the realized prices in each period. Third, this update is customized to the order type being submitted by the trader. Whereas the special case of a market order replicates results in existing papers, new state equations arise for other types of “contingent orders” that practitioners typically submit. Within this new framework, in this initial piece of work, similar to a number of existing papers in the control literature, we view Kelly’s betting fraction K as a feedback gain. Then, unlike existing papers, an optimal gain is obtained by maximizing a metric that we call the Empirical Logarithmic Growth (ELG). The paper also includes a backtesting simulation to illustrate the use of our new model for market and limit orders and includes suggestions for future research aimed at the practitioner’s needs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IFAC-PapersOnLine
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2025.10.104
Primary Topic
Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards a New Stock Trading Model for a Kelly Betting Practitioner

B. Ross Barmish, Anton V. Proskurnikov
IFAC-PapersOnLine
Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research
article

Towards a New Stock Trading Model for a Kelly Betting Practitioner

B. Ross Barmish, Anton V. Proskurnikov
article en

Abstract

The takeoff for this paper is the voluminous body of literature on Kelly Betting in the context of stock market trading. As far as motivation for this work is concerned, the following point is central: The vast preponderance of this literature begins by assuming some “underlying” theoretical model for stock prices, such as Geometric Brownian Motion (GBM), and typically uses empirical data to numerically estimate the parameters entering these dynamics on the way to constructing a trading strategy. In contrast to this literature, our approach in this paper has three salient features: First, no functional form such as GBM for the stock price dynamics is assumed. Second, in our new model for updating the account value, the number of shares held and the cash balance from stage k to k + 1 is entirely data driven based on empirical values of the quadruple (open, low, high, close) of the realized prices in each period. Third, this update is customized to the order type being submitted by the trader. Whereas the special case of a market order replicates results in existing papers, new state equations arise for other types of “contingent orders” that practitioners typically submit. Within this new framework, in this initial piece of work, similar to a number of existing papers in the control literature, we view Kelly’s betting fraction K as a feedback gain. Then, unlike existing papers, an optimal gain is obtained by maximizing a metric that we call the Empirical Logarithmic Growth (ELG). The paper also includes a backtesting simulation to illustrate the use of our new model for market and limit orders and includes suggestions for future research aimed at the practitioner’s needs.

IFAC-PapersOnLineVol. 59(16)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Politecnico di Torino (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.