H∞ Loop Shaping for Robust Attitude Control of Launch Vehicles

This paper presents a systematic framework for applying H ∞ Loop Shaping to the design of Thrust Vector Control systems for the atmospheric ascent of rigid launch vehicles. H ∞ Loop Shaping offers a streamlined alternative to the widely used H ∞ Closed Loop Shaping by automatically ensuring robustness at the plant input and output and preventing the need to simultaneously tune multiple closed-loop transfer functions to achieve the desired goals. The proposed methodology simplifes controller synthesis while maintaining robust stability and performance, as demonstrated by stability margin, structured singular value, and worst-case gain analysis. Preliminary findings suggest equivalency between controllers designed using H ∞ Loop Shaping and H ∞ Closed Loop Shaping, with the former offering a more efficient and less complex approach. Future work will extend the guidelines to flexible launch vehicles and attempt to fully demonstrate the equivalence between controllers attained with both methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IFAC-PapersOnLine
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2025.10.079
Primary Topic
Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

H∞ Loop Shaping for Robust Attitude Control of Launch Vehicles

Spilios Theodoulis, José Carlos Diz, Pedro Simplício
IFAC-PapersOnLine
Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
article

H∞ Loop Shaping for Robust Attitude Control of Launch Vehicles

Spilios Theodoulis, José Carlos Diz, Pedro Simplício
article en

Abstract

This paper presents a systematic framework for applying H ∞ Loop Shaping to the design of Thrust Vector Control systems for the atmospheric ascent of rigid launch vehicles. H ∞ Loop Shaping offers a streamlined alternative to the widely used H ∞ Closed Loop Shaping by automatically ensuring robustness at the plant input and output and preventing the need to simultaneously tune multiple closed-loop transfer functions to achieve the desired goals. The proposed methodology simplifes controller synthesis while maintaining robust stability and performance, as demonstrated by stability margin, structured singular value, and worst-case gain analysis. Preliminary findings suggest equivalency between controllers designed using H ∞ Loop Shaping and H ∞ Closed Loop Shaping, with the former offering a more efficient and less complex approach. Future work will extend the guidelines to flexible launch vehicles and attempt to fully demonstrate the equivalence between controllers attained with both methods.

IFAC-PapersOnLineVol. 59(16)
European Space Research and Technology Centre (NL), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.